<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.0 20040830//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/2.0/journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.0">
    <front>
        <journal-meta>
            <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JMIR</journal-id>
            <journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">J Med Internet Res</journal-id>
            <journal-title>Journal of Medical Internet Research</journal-title>
            <issn pub-type="epub">1438-8871</issn>
            <publisher>
                <publisher-name>JMIR Publications Inc.</publisher-name>
                <publisher-loc>Toronto, Canada</publisher-loc>
            </publisher>
        </journal-meta>
        <article-meta>
            <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">v18i3e70</article-id>
            <article-id pub-id-type="pmid">27005707</article-id>
            <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2196/jmir.5068</article-id>
            <article-categories>
                <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
                    <subject>Original Paper</subject>
                </subj-group>
                <subj-group subj-group-type="article-type">
                    <subject>Original Paper</subject>
                </subj-group>
            </article-categories>
            <title-group>
                <article-title>Assessing the Effects of Participant Preference and Demographics in the Usage of Web-based Survey Questionnaires by Women Attending Screening Mammography in British Columbia</article-title>
            </title-group>
            <contrib-group>
                <contrib contrib-type="editor">
                    <name>
                        <surname>Eysenbach</surname>
                        <given-names>Gunther</given-names>
                    </name>
                </contrib>
            </contrib-group>
            <contrib-group>
                <contrib contrib-type="reviewer">
                    <name>
                        <surname>Patel</surname>
                        <given-names>Rupa</given-names>
                    </name>
                </contrib>
                <contrib contrib-type="reviewer">
                    <name>
                        <surname>Lyshol</surname>
                        <given-names>Heidi</given-names>
                    </name>
                </contrib>
            </contrib-group>
            <contrib-group>
                <contrib contrib-type="author" id="contrib1" corresp="yes" equal-contrib="yes">
                    <name name-style="western">
                        <surname>Mlikotic</surname>
                        <given-names>Rebecca</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <degrees>BSc</degrees>
                    <xref rid="aff1" ref-type="aff">1</xref>
                    <address>
                        <institution>British Columbia Cancer Agency</institution>
                        <institution>Sindi Ahluwalia Hawkins Centre for the Southern Interior</institution>
                        <addr-line>399 Royal Avenue</addr-line>
                        <addr-line>Kelowna, BC, V1Y 5L3</addr-line>
                        <country>Canada</country>
                        <phone>1 250 712 3966 ext 686912</phone>
                        <fax>1 250 712 3911</fax>
                        <email>rebecca.mlikotic@alumni.ubc.ca</email>
                    </address>
                    <ext-link ext-link-type="orcid">http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6949-5123</ext-link>
                </contrib>
                <contrib contrib-type="author" id="contrib2" equal-contrib="yes">
                    <name name-style="western">
                        <surname>Parker</surname>
                        <given-names>Brent</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <degrees>BSc</degrees>
                    <xref rid="aff2" ref-type="aff">2</xref>
                    <ext-link ext-link-type="orcid">http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9792-5207</ext-link>
                </contrib>
                <contrib contrib-type="author" id="contrib3" equal-contrib="yes">
                    <name name-style="western">
                        <surname>Rajapakshe</surname>
                        <given-names>Rasika</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <degrees>PhD</degrees>
                    <xref rid="aff1" ref-type="aff">1</xref>
                    <xref rid="aff3" ref-type="aff">3</xref>
                    <xref rid="aff4" ref-type="aff">4</xref>
                    <ext-link ext-link-type="orcid">http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2149-7274</ext-link>
                </contrib>
            </contrib-group>
            <aff id="aff1">
                <sup>1</sup>
                <institution>British Columbia Cancer Agency</institution>
                <institution>Sindi Ahluwalia Hawkins Centre for the Southern Interior</institution>
                <addr-line>Kelowna, BC</addr-line>
                <country>Canada</country>
            </aff>
            <aff id="aff2">
                <sup>2</sup>
                <institution>Interior Health Authority</institution>
                <institution>Department of Surgical Services</institution>
                <addr-line>Kelowna, BC</addr-line>
                <country>Canada</country>
            </aff>
            <aff id="aff3">
                <sup>3</sup>
                <institution>Faculty of Medicine</institution>
                <institution>Department of Surgery</institution>
                <institution>University of British Columbia</institution>
                <addr-line>Vancouver, BC</addr-line>
                <country>Canada</country>
            </aff>
            <aff id="aff4">
                <sup>4</sup>
                <institution>Irving K. Barber School of Arts and Sciences</institution>
                <institution>Department of Computer Science (Unit 5)</institution>
                <institution>University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus</institution>
                <addr-line>Kelowna, BC</addr-line>
                <country>Canada</country>
            </aff>
            <author-notes>
                <corresp>Corresponding Author: Rebecca Mlikotic <email>rebecca.mlikotic@alumni.ubc.ca</email>
                </corresp>
            </author-notes>
            <pub-date pub-type="collection">
                <month>03</month>
                <year>2016</year>
            </pub-date>
            <pub-date pub-type="epub">
                <day>22</day>
                <month>03</month>
                <year>2016</year>
            </pub-date>
            <volume>18</volume>
            <issue>3</issue>
            <elocation-id>e70</elocation-id>
            <!--history from ojs - api-xml-->
            <history>
                <date date-type="received">
                    <day>26</day>
                    <month>8</month>
                    <year>2015</year>
                </date>
                <date date-type="rev-request">
                    <day>23</day>
                    <month>9</month>
                    <year>2015</year>
                </date>
                <date date-type="rev-recd">
                    <day>29</day>
                    <month>11</month>
                    <year>2015</year>
                </date>
                <date date-type="accepted">
                    <day>7</day>
                    <month>1</month>
                    <year>2016</year>
                </date>
            </history>
            <!--(c) the authors - correct author names and publication date here if necessary. Date in form ', dd.mm.yyyy' after jmir.org-->
            <copyright-statement>&#169;Rebecca Mlikotic, Brent Parker, Rasika Rajapakshe. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 22.03.2016. </copyright-statement>
            <copyright-year>2016</copyright-year>
            <license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
                <p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.</p>
            </license>
            <self-uri xlink:href="http://www.jmir.org/2016/3/e70/" xlink:type="simple" />
            <abstract>
                <sec sec-type="background">
                    <title>Background</title>
                    <p>Increased usage of Internet applications has allowed for the collection of patient reported outcomes (PROs) and other health data through Web-based communication and questionnaires. While these Web platforms allow for increased speed and scope of communication delivery, there are certain limitations associated with this technology, as survey mode preferences vary across demographic groups.</p>
                </sec>
                <sec sec-type="objective">
                    <title>Objective</title>
                    <p>To investigate the impact of demographic factors and participant preferences on the use of a Web-based questionnaire in comparison with more traditional methods (mail and phone) for women participating in screening mammography in British Columbia, Canada.</p>
                </sec>
                <sec sec-type="methods">
                    <title>Methods</title>
                    <p>A sample of women attending the Screening Mammography Program of British Columbia (SMPBC) participated in a breast cancer risk assessment project.  The study questionnaire was administered through one of three modes (ie, telephone, mail, or website platform). Survey mode preferences and actual methods of response were analyzed for participants recruited from Victoria General Hospital. Both univariate and multivariate analyses were used to investigate the association of demographic factors (ie, age, education level, and ethnicity) with certain survey response types.</p>
                </sec>
                <sec sec-type="results">
                    <title>Results</title>
                    <p>A total of 1192 women successfully completed the study questionnaire at Victoria General Hospital. Mail was stated as the most preferred survey mode (509/1192, 42.70%), followed by website platform (422/1192, 35.40%), and telephone (147/1192, 12.33%). Over 80% (955/1192) of participants completed the questionnaire in the mode previously specified as their most preferred; mail was the most common method of response (688/1192, 57.72%). Mail was also the most preferred type of questionnaire response method when participants responded in a mode other than their original preference. The average age of participants who responded via the Web-based platform (age 52.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 52.1-53.7) was significantly lower than those who used mail and telephone methods (age 55.9, 95% CI 55.2-56.5; <italic>P</italic>&#60;.001); each decade of increased age was associated with a 0.97-fold decrease in the odds of using the website platform (<italic>P</italic>&#60;.001). Web-based participation was more likely for those who completed higher levels of education; each interval increase leading to a 1.83 increase in the odds of website platform usage (<italic>P</italic>&#60;.001). Ethnicity was not shown to play a role in participant preference for the website platform (<italic>P</italic>=.96).</p>
                </sec>
                <sec sec-type="conclusions">
                    <title>Conclusions</title>
                    <p>It is beneficial to consider participant survey mode preference when planning to collect PROs and other patient health data. Younger participants and those of higher education level were more likely to use the website platform questionnaire; Web-based participation failed to vary across ethnic group. Because mail questionnaires were still the most preferred survey mode, it will be important to employ strategies, such as user-friendly design and Web-based support, to ensure that the patient feedback being collected is representative of the population being served.</p>
                </sec>
            </abstract>
            <kwd-group>
                <kwd>patient preference</kwd>
                <kwd>patient reported outcomes</kwd>
                <kwd>patient reported outcome measures</kwd>
                <kwd>questionnaires</kwd>
                <kwd>Internet</kwd>
                <kwd>Web-based system</kwd>
                <kwd>survey methods</kwd>
                <kwd>breast cancer screening</kwd>
            </kwd-group>
        </article-meta>
    </front>
    <body>
        <sec sec-type="introduction">
            <title> Introduction</title>
            <p>Survey questionnaires are one of the most prominent data collection methods in cancer health and epidemiological research. Not only do they provide a means for evaluating patient care and treatment efficacy, but they also allow for valuable communication between physicians and patients [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>]. However, the collection of patient reported outcomes (PROs) and other clinical data can be both difficult and costly, resulting in the need for more sustainable collection means [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>]. Current typical survey methods include in-person, phone, mail, and Internet applications. These methods are used both exclusively (single-mode) and in combination (mix-mode); preference is generally shown for mix-mode questionnaires as they typically lead to higher response rates and reduced costs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>].</p>
            <p>Increased use of Internet applications within society and health care has led to a shift toward Web-based surveying methods from more traditional methods such as mail or telephone. These methods include Web-based questionnaires, which can be predesigned as a HyperText Markup Language (HTML) form or assembled from a question database, in addition to mobile questionnaires that operate through a tablet or smart phone [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>]. Web-based methods have also been used in combination with more traditional methods, such as in computer-assisted telephone interviewing (CATI) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>]. Overall, this shift is due to both the speed and ease of Web-based questionnaire delivery [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">14</xref>]. Web-based platforms also allow for potentially larger sample sizes to be reached [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">15</xref>], and a more economical dissemination of the questionnaire compared with more traditional methods [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13</xref>]. Survey questions can also be dynamically adjusted and their allowable answers varied, based on the answers given to previous questions. These methods also allow for automatic upload of patient responses into databases, reducing human error associated with data entry, and thus increasing data quality [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13</xref>]. Occurrences of missing data are also minimized, as certain applications prevent patients from proceeding until the previous survey question has been completed [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>].</p>
            <p>However, Web-based questionnaire applications also present certain limitations. Meaningful patient consent is often difficult to ensure, in addition to the successful integration of PRO data into other medical information records [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>]. While Web-based questionnaire delivery costs may appear more economical than other methods, they involve the cost of professional programmers and the maintenance of data security [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>]. Nonresponse bias is also associated with use of Web-based technologies, as patient participation is often due to factors such as Internet access, in addition to a patient&#8217;s familiarity and comfort level in using Web platforms [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">16</xref>]. Furthermore, demographic groups differ in their personal preferences for and attitudes toward various survey modes. Developing an understanding of which demographic factors influence Web-based application participation will enable both clinicians and researchers to better predict how their platforms will be received in certain settings.</p>
            <p>The Screening Mammography Program of BC (SMPBC) is the longest running organized breast screening program in Canada. It was initiated as a single fixed site in Vancouver in July, 1988 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">17</xref>]. By 2010, geographic coverage of the province was achieved with 42 services employing a variety of delivery modes including four mobile vans. Asymptomatic female residents of BC, age 40 and older, are eligible to attend for regular, bilateral, two-view, screening mammograms in this publically funded program. The SMPBC database contains data on all invasive or in situ breast cancers diagnosed in women who have previously attended the SMPBC and conducts a central pathology review on those cancers. It also uses a paper questionnaire to collect Gail model risk factors from the attending women since its inception in 1988. However, it has been shown that the Tyrer-Cuzic (TC) model is more accurate than the Gail model in predicting breast cancer risk [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">18</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">19</xref>]. Therefore, a study was conducted during 2009 and 2010 to collect TC model risk factors from a sample of women attending the SMPBC. By doing so, the risk distribution for that population was estimated in order to assess the need for additional magnetic resonance images required to screen high-risk women [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">20</xref>]. The participants were given three options for participating in the study: mail-in paper questionnaire, Web-based questionnaire, or phone interview. Our current study attempts to better characterize the effect of survey mode preference and demographic factors that influenced the usage of a Web-based questionnaire in comparison with more traditional methods (phone and mail) for women participating in the original study. Because the current standard of practice of the SMPBC is to collect breast cancer risk factors using a paper-based questionnaire, it is important to understand these characteristics so that the feasibility of administering Web-based questionnaires in the future can be evaluated. This information may also be helpful to others involved in gathering breast cancer risk factors needed for personalizing breast screening strategies.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec sec-type="methods">
            <title> Methods</title>
            <sec>
                <title>Study Population and Recruitment</title>
                <p>Approval of the project was gained through the British Columbia Cancer Agency Research Ethics Board (UBC BCCA REB Certificate #H09-00681). The study data was collected as part of a previous project, where a breast cancer risk assessment was conducted for the women participating in the SMPBC [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">20</xref>]. The focus of this manuscript is a subpopulation of women from the assessment who were attending screening mammography at Victoria General Hospital in Victoria, British Columbia (BC) from August 2009 to January 2010. All participants gave voluntary informed consent prior to study involvement, and were 40 to 79 years of age at the time of the study. The study involved the development and administration of a questionnaire to collect personal information related to common risk factors for breast cancer of women attending the SMPBC [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">20</xref>]. Within the consent form, participants were also asked to state their preferred method of response as either mail, telephone, or the study website platform, should they agree to participate [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">21</xref>]. The questionnaire was distributed by both clerks and on-site volunteers, with each participant invited to complete it at her own convenience using her preferred method of response. All participant information and responses were stored in a study database. Once the questionnaire was completed, an unique study identification was assigned to each participant to ensure confidentiality and anonymity.</p>
            </sec>
            <sec>
                <title>Statistical Analysis</title>
                <p>In order to better understand patient preferences and factors influencing questionnaire response type, both univariate and multivariate analyses were used to explore demographic factors associated with certain response types. All analyses were performed using STATA 13.1.</p>
                <sec>
                    <title>Univariate Analysis</title>
                    <p>Survey mode preferences were compared with actual response type. Age was grouped into four cohorts: 40 to 49, 50 to 59, 60 to 69, and 70 to 79. The distribution of questionnaire response types was determined for three demographic factors: age, education level, and ethnicity. Mean participation rates for each demographic variable were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test, Wilcoxin Rank-Sum test, or Fisher&#8217;s exact test.</p>
                </sec>
                <sec>
                    <title>Multivariate Analysis</title>
                    <p>Of specific interest was improved characterization of the association between the available demographic factors and Internet participation, and differences between proportions were assessed using chi-square and Fisher&#8217;s exact tests. Multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between Web-based survey usage versus other modes, adjusting for age, education level, and ethnicity. Each of these three variables was forced into the logistic model. Of the demographic variables, interaction was found only between education and age. Statistical significance was defined as <italic>P</italic>&#60;.05.</p>
                </sec>
            </sec>
        </sec>
        <sec sec-type="results">
            <title>Results</title>
            <sec>
                <title>Participant Survey Mode Preference</title>
                <p>A total of 1192 women successfully completed the study questionnaire at Victoria General Hospital. Of the three survey modes, distribution by mail was the most preferred (509/1192, 42.70%), followed by website platform (422/1192, 35.40%), and telephone (147/1192, 12.33%; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). Approximately 10% of participants (114/1192, 9.56%) did not specify a preferred method of response in their consent form.</p>
                <p>Survey mode preference differed between younger (&#60;60 years) and older (&#62;60 years) patients, as preference for mail and telephone questionnaires strengthened with age (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure1">Figure 1</xref>). In contrast, the Web-based option became less preferred with each subsequent age grouping. Higher levels of post-secondary education led to a stronger preference for Web-based questionnaires, while the opposite trend was observed for mail. With regards to ethnicity, nearly all groups expressed a preference for the mail mode.</p>
            </sec>
            <sec>
                <title>Variation Between Preferred and Actual Participant Survey Response</title>
                <p>In all, 80.12% (955/1192) of patients completed the questionnaire in the mode that was previously specified as their most preferred method (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Tables 2, 3</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure2">Figure 2</xref>). For those who responded in a method other than their original preference, mail was the most common response type. In addition, for those who did not specify a preferred response method, mail was also the most common response type (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>).</p>
                <table-wrap position="float" id="table1">
                    <label>Table 1</label>
                    <caption>
                        <p>Preferred method of questionnaire response stratified by participant demographics.</p>
                    </caption>
                    <table width="631" border="0" cellpadding="7" cellspacing="0" rules="groups" frame="hsides">
                        <col width="4" />
                        <col width="194" />
                        <col width="75" />
                        <col width="56" />
                        <col width="60" />
                        <col width="82" />
                        <col width="64" />
                        <thead>
                            <tr valign="top">
                                <td colspan="2">
                                    <break />
                                </td>
                                <td>Telephone</td>
                                <td>Mail</td>
                                <td>Website</td>
                                <td>Unspecified</td>
                                <td>Total</td>
                            </tr>
                        </thead>
                        <tbody>
                            <tr valign="top">
                                <td colspan="2">
                                    <break />
                                </td>
                                <td>n=147</td>
                                <td>n=509</td>
                                <td>n=422</td>
                                <td>n=114</td>
                                <td>n=1192</td>
                            </tr>
                            <tr valign="top">
                                <td colspan="7">Age</td>
                            </tr>
                            <tr valign="top">
                                <td>
                                    <break />
                                </td>
                                <td>40-49</td>
                                <td>44</td>
                                <td>174</td>
                                <td>171</td>
                                <td>30</td>
                                <td>419</td>
                            </tr>
                            <tr valign="top">
                                <td>
                                    <break />
                                </td>
                                <td>50-59</td>
                                <td>41</td>
                                <td>149</td>
                                <td>139</td>
                                <td>37</td>
                                <td>366</td>
                            </tr>
                            <tr valign="top">
                                <td>
                                    <break />
                                </td>
                                <td>60-69</td>
                                <td>49</td>
                                <td>144</td>
                                <td>97</td>
                                <td>41</td>
                                <td>331</td>
                            </tr>
                            <tr valign="top">
                                <td>
                                    <break />
                                </td>
                                <td>70-79</td>
                                <td>13</td>
                                <td>42</td>
                                <td>15</td>
                                <td>6</td>
                                <td>76</td>
                            </tr>
                            <tr valign="top">
                                <td colspan="7">Education</td>
                            </tr>
                            <tr valign="top">
                                <td>
                                    <break />
                                </td>
                                <td>Grade 9 or Less</td>
                                <td>2</td>
                                <td>9</td>
                                <td>0</td>
                                <td>1</td>
                                <td>12</td>
                            </tr>
                            <tr valign="top">
                                <td>
                                    <break />
                                </td>
                                <td>Some high school</td>
                                <td>10</td>
                                <td>30</td>
                                <td>15</td>
                                <td>7</td>
                                <td>62</td>
                            </tr>
                            <tr valign="top">
                                <td>
                                    <break />
                                </td>
                                <td>High school diploma</td>
                                <td>37</td>
                                <td>119</td>
                                <td>50</td>
                                <td>20</td>
                                <td>226</td>
                            </tr>
                            <tr valign="top">
                                <td>
                                    <break />
                                </td>
                                <td>Some college</td>
                                <td>42</td>
                                <td>192</td>
                                <td>123</td>
                                <td>52</td>
                                <td>409</td>
                            </tr>
                            <tr valign="top">
                                <td>
                                    <break />
                                </td>
                                <td>University degree</td>
                                <td>56</td>
                                <td>159</td>
                                <td>234</td>
                                <td>34</td>
                                <td>483</td>
                            </tr>
                            <tr valign="top">
                                <td colspan="7">Ethnicity</td>
                            </tr>
                            <tr valign="bottom">
                                <td>
                                    <break />
                                </td>
                                <td>White<sup>a</sup>
                                </td>
                                <td>133</td>
                                <td>478</td>
                                <td>386</td>
                                <td>111</td>
                                <td>1108</td>
                            </tr>
                            <tr valign="top">
                                <td>
                                    <break />
                                </td>
                                <td>Other</td>
                                <td>6</td>
                                <td>10</td>
                                <td>20</td>
                                <td>3</td>
                                <td>39</td>
                            </tr>
                            <tr valign="top">
                                <td>
                                    <break />
                                </td>
                                <td>East/Southeast Asian</td>
                                <td>4</td>
                                <td>10</td>
                                <td>8</td>
                                <td>0</td>
                                <td>22</td>
                            </tr>
                            <tr valign="top">
                                <td>
                                    <break />
                                </td>
                                <td>First Nation/M&#233;tis</td>
                                <td>2</td>
                                <td>5</td>
                                <td>5</td>
                                <td>0</td>
                                <td>12</td>
                            </tr>
                            <tr valign="top">
                                <td>
                                    <break />
                                </td>
                                <td>South Asian</td>
                                <td>1</td>
                                <td>4</td>
                                <td>2</td>
                                <td>0</td>
                                <td>7</td>
                            </tr>
                            <tr valign="top">
                                <td>
                                    <break />
                                </td>
                                <td>African/African American</td>
                                <td>1</td>
                                <td>2</td>
                                <td>1</td>
                                <td>0</td>
                                <td>4</td>
                            </tr>
                        </tbody>
                    </table>
                    <table-wrap-foot>
                        <fn id="table1fn1">
                            <p>
                                <sup>a</sup>White = British/French/Irish/Scottish/Welsh/(Northern, Southern, Eastern, or Western) European.</p>
                        </fn>
                    </table-wrap-foot>
                </table-wrap>
                <fig id="figure1" position="float">
                    <label>Figure 1</label>
                    <caption>
                        <p>Percent distribution of participant demographics for each preferred method of questionnaire response (n = 1192).</p>
                    </caption>
                    <graphic xlink:href="jmir_v18i3e70_fig1.jpg" alt-version="no" mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" />
                </fig>
                <table-wrap position="float" id="table2">
                    <label>Table 2</label>
                    <caption>
                        <p>Actual method of questionnaire response stratified by participant demographics.</p>
                    </caption>
                    <table width="427" border="0" cellpadding="7" cellspacing="0" rules="groups" frame="hsides">
                        <col width="3" />
                        <col width="123" />
                        <col width="51" />
                        <col width="59" />
                        <col width="58" />
                        <col width="49" />
                        <thead>
                            <tr valign="top">
                                <td colspan="2">
                                    <break />
                                </td>
                                <td>Telephone</td>
                                <td>Mail</td>
                                <td>Website</td>
                                <td>Total</td>
                            </tr>
                        </thead>
                        <tbody>
                            <tr valign="top">
                                <td colspan="2">
                                    <break />
                                </td>
                                <td>n=133</td>
                                <td>n=688</td>
                                <td>n=371</td>
                                <td>n=1192</td>
                            </tr>
                            <tr valign="top">
                                <td colspan="6">Age</td>
                            </tr>
                            <tr valign="top">
                                <td>
                                    <break />
                                </td>
                                <td>40-49</td>
                                <td>41</td>
                                <td>227</td>
                                <td>151</td>
                                <td>419</td>
                            </tr>
                            <tr valign="top">
                                <td>
                                    <break />
                                </td>
                                <td>50-59</td>
                                <td>34</td>
                                <td>201</td>
                                <td>131</td>
                                <td>366</td>
                            </tr>
                            <tr valign="top">
                                <td>
                                    <break />
                                </td>
                                <td>60-69</td>
                                <td>46</td>
                                <td>208</td>
                                <td>77</td>
                                <td>331</td>
                            </tr>
                            <tr valign="top">
                                <td>
                                    <break />
                                </td>
                                <td>70-79</td>
                                <td>12</td>
                                <td>52</td>
                                <td>12</td>
                                <td>76</td>
                            </tr>
                            <tr valign="top">
                                <td colspan="6">Education</td>
                            </tr>
                            <tr valign="top">
                                <td>
                                    <break />
                                </td>
                                <td>Grade 9 or Less</td>
                                <td>2</td>
                                <td>10</td>
                                <td>0</td>
                                <td>12</td>
                            </tr>
                            <tr valign="top">
                                <td>
                                    <break />
                                </td>
                                <td>Some high school</td>
                                <td>9</td>
                                <td>41</td>
                                <td>12</td>
                                <td>62</td>
                            </tr>
                            <tr valign="top">
                                <td>
                                    <break />
                                </td>
                                <td>High school diploma</td>
                                <td>32</td>
                                <td>153</td>
                                <td>41</td>
                                <td>226</td>
                            </tr>
                            <tr valign="top">
                                <td>
                                    <break />
                                </td>
                                <td>Some college</td>
                                <td>33</td>
                                <td>279</td>
                                <td>97</td>
                                <td>409</td>
                            </tr>
                            <tr valign="top">
                                <td>
                                    <break />
                                </td>
                                <td>University degree</td>
                                <td>57</td>
                                <td>205</td>
                                <td>221</td>
                                <td>483</td>
                            </tr>
                            <tr valign="top">
                                <td colspan="6">Ethnicity</td>
                            </tr>
                            <tr valign="bottom">
                                <td>
                                    <break />
                                </td>
                                <td>White<sup>a</sup>
                                </td>
                                <td>116</td>
                                <td>649</td>
                                <td>343</td>
                                <td>1108</td>
                            </tr>
                            <tr valign="top">
                                <td>
                                    <break />
                                </td>
                                <td>Other</td>
                                <td>7</td>
                                <td>13</td>
                                <td>19</td>
                                <td>39</td>
                            </tr>
                            <tr valign="top">
                                <td>
                                    <break />
                                </td>
                                <td>East/Southeast Asian</td>
                                <td>4</td>
                                <td>13</td>
                                <td>5</td>
                                <td>22</td>
                            </tr>
                            <tr valign="top">
                                <td>
                                    <break />
                                </td>
                                <td>First Nation/M&#233;tis</td>
                                <td>4</td>
                                <td>6</td>
                                <td>2</td>
                                <td>12</td>
                            </tr>
                            <tr valign="top">
                                <td>
                                    <break />
                                </td>
                                <td>South Asian</td>
                                <td>1</td>
                                <td>5</td>
                                <td>1</td>
                                <td>7</td>
                            </tr>
                            <tr valign="top">
                                <td>
                                    <break />
                                </td>
                                <td>African/African American</td>
                                <td>1</td>
                                <td>2</td>
                                <td>1</td>
                                <td>4</td>
                            </tr>
                        </tbody>
                    </table>
                    <table-wrap-foot>
                        <fn id="table2fn1">
                            <p>
                                <sup>a</sup>White = British/French/Irish/Scottish/ Welsh/(Northern, Southern, Eastern, or Western) European.</p>
                        </fn>
                    </table-wrap-foot>
                </table-wrap>
                <table-wrap position="float" id="table3">
                    <label>Table 3</label>
                    <caption>
                        <p>Comparison of participant-stated preferences and actual survey response types.</p>
                    </caption>
                    <table width="436" border="0" cellpadding="7" cellspacing="0" rules="groups" frame="hsides">
                        <col width="4" />
                        <col width="108" />
                        <col width="69" />
                        <col width="50" />
                        <col width="63" />
                        <col width="59" />
                        <thead>
                            <tr valign="top">
                                <td colspan="2">
                                    <break />
                                </td>
                                <td colspan="4">Actual Response Type</td>
                            </tr>
                        </thead>
                        <tbody>
                            <tr valign="top">
                                <td colspan="2">
                                    <break />
                                </td>
                                <td>Telephone</td>
                                <td>Mail</td>
                                <td>Website</td>
                                <td>Total</td>
                            </tr>
                            <tr valign="top">
                                <td colspan="2">
                                    <break />
                                </td>
                                <td>n=133</td>
                                <td>n=688</td>
                                <td>n=371</td>
                                <td>n=1192</td>
                            </tr>
                            <tr valign="top">
                                <td colspan="6">Preferred response type</td>
                            </tr>
                            <tr valign="top">
                                <td>
                                    <break />
                                </td>
                                <td>Telephone</td>
                                <td>120</td>
                                <td>23</td>
                                <td>4</td>
                                <td>147</td>
                            </tr>
                            <tr valign="top">
                                <td>
                                    <break />
                                </td>
                                <td>Mail</td>
                                <td>5</td>
                                <td>492</td>
                                <td>12</td>
                                <td>509</td>
                            </tr>
                            <tr valign="top">
                                <td>
                                    <break />
                                </td>
                                <td>Website</td>
                                <td>8</td>
                                <td>71</td>
                                <td>343</td>
                                <td>422</td>
                            </tr>
                            <tr valign="top">
                                <td>
                                    <break />
                                </td>
                                <td>Unspecified</td>
                                <td>0</td>
                                <td>102</td>
                                <td>12</td>
                                <td>114</td>
                            </tr>
                        </tbody>
                    </table>
                </table-wrap>
                <fig id="figure2" position="float">
                    <label>Figure 2</label>
                    <caption>
                        <p>Percent distribution of participant demographics for each actual questionnaire response type (n = 1192).</p>
                    </caption>
                    <graphic xlink:href="jmir_v18i3e70_fig2.jpg" alt-version="no" mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" />
                </fig>
            </sec>
            <sec>
                <title>Actual Patient Survey Response</title>
                <p>The study uptake at the Victoria General Hospital for which this analysis is performed was found to be 47% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">20</xref>]. This is comparable with the on-site study uptake of 31% to 50% in a similar risk assessment study conducted by Evans and colleagues [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">22</xref>]. Of the questionnaires that were completed, 57.72% (688/1192) were submitted via mail, followed by the 31.12% (371/1192) completed using the website platform, and the 11.16% (133/1192) by telephone (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Tables 2</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">3</xref>). The overall average age for participation was 55 years (95% confidence interval [CI] 54.4-55.5). The average age of participants was significantly lower for those who responded via the website platform (52.9, 95% CI 52.1-53.7) compared with those who used telephone or mail (55.9, 95% CI 55.2-56.5; <italic>P</italic>&#60;.001).</p>
                <p>Each additional level of education showed an increased number of respondents, with university graduates being the largest group to complete the questionnaire (483/1192, 40.52%). Web-based participation was also more likely in higher education groups (<italic>P</italic>&#60;.001). With regards to ethnicity, the study population was dominated by White participants (1108/1192, 92.95%); additional ethnic groups were then consolidated into a &#8220;Nonwhite&#8221; group for subsequent analysis.</p>
                <p>Logistic regression demonstrated that, after adjusting for age and education level, ethnicity (White vs nonwhite) was not predictive of survey mode usage (<italic>P</italic>=.96) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>). Both age and education were significantly associated with Web-based participation versus other modes (<italic>P</italic>&#60;.001 for both variables).</p>
                <p>Each decade of increased age was associated with a 0.97-fold decrease in the odds of a patient participating on the website platform when compared to other available methods (odds ratio [OR] 0.97, <italic>P</italic>&#60;.001). Each interval increase in education level saw a 1.83-fold increase in the odds of website platform usage (OR 1.83, <italic>P</italic>&#60;.001). However a low <italic>R</italic>
                    <sup>2</sup> value (0.06) denotes that age and education alone are poor predictors of response type, even when considering them together. Therefore, these results suggest that there are factors other than age and level of education that are likely to influence which mode people use to participate.</p>
                <table-wrap position="float" id="table4">
                    <label>Table 4</label>
                    <caption>
                        <p>Odds ratios from multivariate logistic regression predicting survey mode usage within each demographic variable (age, education level, and ethnicity).</p>
                    </caption>
                    <table width="575" border="0" cellpadding="7" cellspacing="0" rules="groups" frame="hsides">
                        <col width="203" />
                        <col width="121" />
                        <col width="121" />
                        <col width="75" />
                        <thead>
                            <tr valign="top">
                                <td>Demographic Variable</td>
                                <td>Odds Ratio</td>
                                <td>Standard Error</td>
                                <td>
                                    <italic>P</italic>
                                </td>
                            </tr>
                        </thead>
                        <tbody>
                            <tr valign="bottom">
                                <td>Education<sup>a</sup>
                                </td>
                                <td>1.83</td>
                                <td>0.08</td>
                                <td>&#60; .001</td>
                            </tr>
                            <tr valign="bottom">
                                <td>Age<sup>a</sup>
                                </td>
                                <td>0.97</td>
                                <td>0.01</td>
                                <td>&#60; .001</td>
                            </tr>
                            <tr valign="bottom">
                                <td>Ethnicity,<sup>b</sup> Nonwhite</td>
                                <td>1.01</td>
                                <td>0.25</td>
                                <td>.96</td>
                            </tr>
                            <tr valign="top">
                                <td>Constant</td>
                                <td>0.00</td>
                                <td>1.62</td>
                                <td>&#60; .001</td>
                            </tr>
                        </tbody>
                    </table>
                    <table-wrap-foot>
                        <fn id="table4fn1">
                            <p>
                                <sup>a</sup>Education and age treated as continuous/ordinal variables.</p>
                        </fn>
                        <fn id="table4fn2">
                            <p>
                                <sup>b</sup>White (British/French/Irish/Scottish/Welsh/[Northern, Southern, Eastern, or Western] European).</p>
                        </fn>
                    </table-wrap-foot>
                </table-wrap>
            </sec>
        </sec>
        <sec sec-type="discussion">
            <title>Discussion</title>
            <sec>
                <title>Principal Results</title>
                <p>Consistent with other single-mode survey studies, response rates were higher in the mode that was originally stated as the participant&#8217;s preferred mode [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">16</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23">23</xref>]. Mail was the most preferred type of questionnaire response, and was also the most commonly used method when participants responded in a mode other than their original preference. Previous studies conducted on men and women have found that both participant attitudes toward, and familiarity with, a certain type of survey technology play an important role in their usage of that particular mode [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">16</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24">24</xref>]. Therefore, it is not surprising that the mail method was commonly reverted to, especially due to the massive use of paper (mail) in our current culture. However, as Internet usage among adults continues to grow in our society, from a rate of 14% in 1995 to 87% in 2014, for example [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">25</xref>], we may begin to see a shift away from more traditional methods, such as mail toward Internet technologies such as Web-based questionnaires (as offered through this study), mobile applications, email, and text message. Moreover, familiarity with specific survey modes may vary across many demographic groups. For example, studies have shown that both younger participants and those with higher education are more likely to use the Internet and Web-based technologies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref26">26</xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref31">31</xref>]. This is consistent with our findings. In turn, our results did not show ethnicity to be a predictor for (or against) Web-based questionnaire usage in this study. This is consistent with a recent systematic literature review that reported research based in five multiethnic developed countries (Canada, United States, United Kingdom, New Zealand, and Australia); results found that Nonwhite populations (eg, African American, Asian, and Hispanic) who participate in surveys are as likely to participate in research as Whites [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">32</xref>].</p>
                <p>For all respondents included in the Weisstock et al. study [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">20</xref>], a mean age of 56.6 years (SD 9.6 years) was observed, which was comparable to our subpopulation mean of 55 years (95% CI 54.4-55.5). These respondents displayed an age distribution comparable to that of women in the SMPBC and British Columbian residents at the time of the study. Our subpopulation was dominated by White participants (1108/1192, 92.95%), which included those of British / French / Irish / Scottish / Welsh / (Northern / Southern / Eastern / Western) European descent (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Tables 1</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">2</xref>). This is consistent with the overall study population for Weisstock et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">20</xref>], where the most prevalent ethnicity was British/Irish/Scottish/Welsh (54% of respondents); furthermore, 49% of British Columbians self-reported ethnic backgrounds of British Isles / European / English / Scottish / Canadian / Irish / Welsh descent during the 2006 census. As with our results, age was found to influence questionnaire response mode, as younger women responded more frequently using the Web-based questionnaire, while older participants tended to respond via mail (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>).</p>
                <p>As Internet technology continues to be integrated into society at various social, educational, and institutional levels, these demographic groups may not be so predictive of Web-based survey usage. While we expect the Internet to continue to become more accepted as a common means of communication, there are still many individuals, particularly those from older generations and lower education levels, who prefer mail and may be intimidated by their lack of familiarity with mobile platforms or anticipated difficulties in navigating Web-based systems [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24">24</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">27</xref>]. This is especially significant in Canada, where approximately 1 in 6 Canadians are at least 65 years of age [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref33">33</xref>]. In turn, the current estimated growth rate of this population is 3.5%, approximately four times that of the total population growth rate. While many individuals within this age group may become more comfortable with technology use as they age, we must still prepare for a large proportion of this population to still prefer mail for the duration of their lifetime. Therefore, studies similar to this one will be important in future work, in order to assess how people over the age of 40, the typical age demographic for cancer diagnoses, respond to various forms of survey methods.</p>
                <p>With regards to breast cancer, the use of alternative approaches to screening has been proposed [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref34">34</xref>]. These alternative approaches would involve making more individualized decisions based on a woman&#8217;s breast cancer risk factors and beliefs about the risks and benefits of screening mammography. This will require the collection of detailed breast cancer risk information from the eligible women, in order to estimate their risk of developing breast cancer. Web-based collection of the breast cancer risk factors may be an effective way to collect this information and, therefore, the results of this study will be of importance as personalized breast screening regimens become more main stream.</p>
                <p>Moving forward, there is a need to protect already declining response rates [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">15</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">16</xref>]. The inclusion of a paper option to a Web-based survey (or vice versa) may be needed so as to prevent a premature dependency on mobile survey methods. Furthermore, it will be beneficial to develop platforms that are user-friendly and intuitive for various age groups, especially those of older generations. This is especially important for research and health service work that aims to obtain a representative sample of the population of interest. It will also be helpful to provide support through study personnel or educational materials, in order to instruct patients on how to properly use a Web-based survey system and increase their confidence with its usage [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24">24</xref>]. Integration of such strategies will help minimize the sample bias that may typically occur should survey participation factors not be considered.</p>
            </sec>
            <sec>
                <title>Limitations</title>
                <p>The predominant limitation of this study is that all participants involved were registered with the SMPBC, and were consequently adult females in the age range eligible for screening mammography (40-79 years). With the median age of Canadians being 39.9 years, we acknowledge that women within our study are generally older than the general population in Canada [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref35">35</xref>]. In turn, our population does not allow for any determination of the effect of gender on response rate and mode. Therefore, our results regarding the effects of participant preference and demographic effect on survey mode response may not be generalizable to populations that include males and females of other ages.</p>
            </sec>
            <sec>
                <title> Conclusions</title>
                <p>Our findings suggest that it is important to consider participant&#8217;s survey mode preference when designing and implementing PRO surveys. In turn, younger participants and those with higher levels of education were more likely to use the mobile platform; Web-based participation failed to vary across ethnic groups. Overall, this information will be very valuable during the planning stages of future studies. PROs are becoming increasingly used in breast cancer screening regimens and health care systems of the developed world, making it imperative that approaches to obtaining patient feedback are representative of the population being served. For this reason, clinicians and researchers must be diligent in implementing survey modes that capture data of their desired patient cohorts.</p>
            </sec>
        </sec>
    </body>
    <back>
        <glossary>
            <title>Abbreviations</title>
            <def-list>
                <def-item>
                    <term id="abb1">CATI</term>
                    <def>
                        <p>computer-assisted telephone interviewing</p>
                    </def>
                </def-item>
                <def-item>
                    <term id="abb2">CI</term>
                    <def>
                        <p>confidence interval</p>
                    </def>
                </def-item>
                <def-item>
                    <term id="abb3">HTML</term>
                    <def>
                        <p>HyperText Markup Language</p>
                    </def>
                </def-item>
                <def-item>
                    <term id="abb4">OR</term>
                    <def>
                        <p>odds ratio</p>
                    </def>
                </def-item>
                <def-item>
                    <term id="abb5">PRO(s)</term>
                    <def>
                        <p>patient reported outcome(s)</p>
                    </def>
                </def-item>
                <def-item>
                    <term id="abb6">SMPBC</term>
                    <def>
                        <p>Screening Mammography Program of British Columbia</p>
                    </def>
                </def-item>
                <def-item>
                    <term id="abb7">TC</term>
                    <def>
                        <p>Tyrer-Cuzic</p>
                    </def>
                </def-item>
            </def-list>
        </glossary>
        <ack>
            <p>This study would not have been possible without the cooperation of the study participants &#8211; attendees of the Screening Mammography Program of BC. The authors also express their gratitude to both Krista Clement and Chelsea Vandenberg for their valuable input on the original manuscript, and all University of British Columbia Okanagan Campus student volunteers and SMPBC clerical staff who helped with survey distribution at various SMPBC screening sites. Funding for this work was provided through the Canadian Breast Cancer Foundation, BC Yukon Region, and the BC Cancer Foundation.</p>
        </ack>
        <fn-group>
            <fn fn-type="conflict">
                <p>None declared.</p>
            </fn>
        </fn-group>
        <ref-list>
            <ref id="ref1">
                <label>1</label>
                <nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Gwaltney</surname>
                            <given-names>CJ</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Shields</surname>
                            <given-names>AL</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Shiffman</surname>
                            <given-names>S</given-names>
                        </name>
                    </person-group>
                    <article-title>Equivalence of electronic and paper-and-pencil administration of patient-reported outcome measures: a meta-analytic review</article-title>
                    <source>Value Health</source>
                    <year>2008</year>
                    <volume>11</volume>
                    <fpage>322</fpage>
                    <lpage>333</lpage>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00231.x</pub-id>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="medline">18380645</pub-id>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="pii">VHE231</pub-id>
                </nlm-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref2">
                <label>2</label>
                <nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Ashley</surname>
                            <given-names>L</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Jones</surname>
                            <given-names>H</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Thomas</surname>
                            <given-names>J</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Newsham</surname>
                            <given-names>A</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Downing</surname>
                            <given-names>A</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Morris</surname>
                            <given-names>E</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Brown</surname>
                            <given-names>J</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Velikova</surname>
                            <given-names>G</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Forman</surname>
                            <given-names>D</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Wright</surname>
                            <given-names>P</given-names>
                        </name>
                    </person-group>
                    <article-title>Integrating patient reported outcomes with clinical cancer registry data: a feasibility study of the electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes From Cancer Survivors (ePOCS) system</article-title>
                    <source>J Med Internet Res</source>
                    <year>2013</year>
                    <volume>15</volume>
                    <fpage>e230</fpage>
                    <comment>
                        <ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="http://www.jmir.org/2013/10/e230/" />
                    </comment>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2196/jmir.2764</pub-id>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="medline">24161667</pub-id>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="pii">v15i10e230</pub-id>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC3841364</pub-id>
                </nlm-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref3">
                <label>3</label>
                <nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Garcia</surname>
                            <given-names>I</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Portugal</surname>
                            <given-names>C</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Chu</surname>
                            <given-names>L</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Kawatkar</surname>
                            <given-names>AA</given-names>
                        </name>
                    </person-group>
                    <article-title>Response rates of three modes of survey administration and survey preferences of rheumatoid arthritis patients</article-title>
                    <source>Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)</source>
                    <year>2014</year>
                    <volume>66</volume>
                    <fpage>364</fpage>
                    <lpage>370</lpage>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/acr.22125</pub-id>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="medline">23982942</pub-id>
                </nlm-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref4">
                <label>4</label>
                <nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Greene</surname>
                            <given-names>J</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Speizer</surname>
                            <given-names>H</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Wiitala</surname>
                            <given-names>W</given-names>
                        </name>
                    </person-group>
                    <article-title>Telephone and web: mixed-mode challenge</article-title>
                    <source>Health Serv Res</source>
                    <year>2008</year>
                    <volume>43</volume>
                    <issue>Pt 1</issue>
                    <fpage>230</fpage>
                    <lpage>248</lpage>
                    <comment>
                        <ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/18211527" />
                    </comment>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1475-6773.2007.00747.x</pub-id>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="medline">18211527</pub-id>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="pii">HESR747</pub-id>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC2323139</pub-id>
                </nlm-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref5">
                <label>5</label>
                <nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Sinclair</surname>
                            <given-names>M</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>O'Toole</surname>
                            <given-names>J</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Malawaraarachchi</surname>
                            <given-names>M</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Leder</surname>
                            <given-names>K</given-names>
                        </name>
                    </person-group>
                    <article-title>Comparison of response rates and cost-effectiveness for a community-based survey: postal, internet and telephone modes with generic or personalised recruitment approaches</article-title>
                    <source>BMC Med Res Methodol</source>
                    <year>2012</year>
                    <volume>12</volume>
                    <fpage>132</fpage>
                    <comment>
                        <ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/12/132" />
                    </comment>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1471-2288-12-132</pub-id>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="medline">22938205</pub-id>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="pii">1471-2288-12-132</pub-id>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC3502082</pub-id>
                </nlm-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref6">
                <label>6</label>
                <nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Cooper</surname>
                            <given-names>CJ</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Cooper</surname>
                            <given-names>SP</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>del Junco</surname>
                            <given-names>DJ</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Shipp</surname>
                            <given-names>EM</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Whitworth</surname>
                            <given-names>R</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Cooper</surname>
                            <given-names>SR</given-names>
                        </name>
                    </person-group>
                    <article-title>Web-based data collection: detailed methods of a questionnaire and data gathering tool</article-title>
                    <source>Epidemiol Perspect Innov</source>
                    <year>2006</year>
                    <volume>3</volume>
                    <fpage>1</fpage>
                    <comment>
                        <ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="http://www.epi-perspectives.com/content/3//1" />
                    </comment>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1742-5573-3-1</pub-id>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="medline">16390556</pub-id>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="pii">1742-5573-3-1</pub-id>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC1343557</pub-id>
                </nlm-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref7">
                <label>7</label>
                <nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Schleyer</surname>
                            <given-names>TK</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Forrest</surname>
                            <given-names>JL</given-names>
                        </name>
                    </person-group>
                    <article-title>Methods for the design and administration of web-based surveys</article-title>
                    <source>J Am Med Inform Assoc</source>
                    <year>2000</year>
                    <volume>7</volume>
                    <fpage>416</fpage>
                    <lpage>425</lpage>
                    <comment>
                        <ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="http://jamia.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&#38;pmid=10887169" />
                    </comment>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="medline">10887169</pub-id>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC61445</pub-id>
                </nlm-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref8">
                <label>8</label>
                <nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>van Gelder</surname>
                            <given-names>MM</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Bretveld</surname>
                            <given-names>RW</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Roeleveld</surname>
                            <given-names>N</given-names>
                        </name>
                    </person-group>
                    <article-title>Web-based questionnaires: the future in epidemiology?</article-title>
                    <source>Am J Epidemiol</source>
                    <year>2010</year>
                    <volume>172</volume>
                    <fpage>1292</fpage>
                    <lpage>1298</lpage>
                    <comment>
                        <ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&#38;pmid=20880962" />
                    </comment>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/aje/kwq291</pub-id>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="medline">20880962</pub-id>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="pii">kwq291</pub-id>
                </nlm-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref9">
                <label>9</label>
                <nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Choi</surname>
                            <given-names>BC</given-names>
                        </name>
                    </person-group>
                    <article-title>Computer assisted telephone interviewing (CATI) for health surveys in public health surveillance: methodological issues and challenges ahead</article-title>
                    <source>Chronic Dis Can</source>
                    <year>2004</year>
                    <volume>25</volume>
                    <issue>2</issue>
                    <fpage>21</fpage>
                    <lpage>7</lpage>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="medline">15554608</pub-id>
                </nlm-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref10">
                <label>10</label>
                <nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Bergeson</surname>
                            <given-names>SC</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Gray</surname>
                            <given-names>J</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Ehrmantraut</surname>
                            <given-names>LA</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Laibson</surname>
                            <given-names>T</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Hays</surname>
                            <given-names>RD</given-names>
                        </name>
                    </person-group>
                    <article-title>Comparing Web-based with Mail Survey Administration of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS(&#174;)) Clinician and Group Survey</article-title>
                    <source>Prim Health Care</source>
                    <year>2013</year>
                    <volume>3</volume>
                    <fpage>1</fpage>
                    <lpage>15</lpage>
                    <comment>
                        <ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/24078901" />
                    </comment>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4172/2167-1079.1000132</pub-id>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="medline">24078901</pub-id>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC3783026</pub-id>
                </nlm-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref11">
                <label>11</label>
                <nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Br&#248;gger</surname>
                            <given-names>J</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Nystad</surname>
                            <given-names>W</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Cappelen</surname>
                            <given-names>I</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Bakke</surname>
                            <given-names>P</given-names>
                        </name>
                    </person-group>
                    <article-title>No increase in response rate by adding a web response option to a postal population survey: a randomized trial</article-title>
                    <source>J Med Internet Res</source>
                    <year>2007</year>
                    <volume>9</volume>
                    <fpage>e40</fpage>
                    <comment>
                        <ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="http://www.jmir.org/2007/5/e40/" />
                    </comment>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2196/jmir.9.5.e40</pub-id>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="medline">18174120</pub-id>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="pii">v9i5e40</pub-id>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC2270416</pub-id>
                </nlm-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref12">
                <label>12</label>
                <nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Fleming</surname>
                            <given-names>CM</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Bowden</surname>
                            <given-names>M</given-names>
                        </name>
                    </person-group>
                    <article-title>Web-based surveys as an alternative to traditional mail methods</article-title>
                    <source>J Environ Manage</source>
                    <year>2009</year>
                    <volume>90</volume>
                    <fpage>284</fpage>
                    <lpage>292</lpage>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.09.011</pub-id>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="medline">18082316</pub-id>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="pii">S0301-4797(07)00349-0</pub-id>
                </nlm-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref13">
                <label>13</label>
                <nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Harewood</surname>
                            <given-names>GC</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Yacavone</surname>
                            <given-names>RF</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Locke</surname>
                            <given-names>GR</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Wiersema</surname>
                            <given-names>MJ</given-names>
                        </name>
                    </person-group>
                    <article-title>Prospective comparison of endoscopy patient satisfaction surveys: e-mail versus standard mail versus telephone</article-title>
                    <source>Am J Gastroenterol</source>
                    <year>2001</year>
                    <volume>96</volume>
                    <fpage>3312</fpage>
                    <lpage>3317</lpage>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.05331.x</pub-id>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="medline">11774942</pub-id>
                </nlm-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref14">
                <label>14</label>
                <nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Zuidgeest</surname>
                            <given-names>M</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Hendriks</surname>
                            <given-names>M</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Koopman</surname>
                            <given-names>L</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Spreeuwenberg</surname>
                            <given-names>P</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Rademakers</surname>
                            <given-names>J</given-names>
                        </name>
                    </person-group>
                    <article-title>A comparison of a postal survey and mixed-mode survey using a questionnaire on patients' experiences with breast care</article-title>
                    <source>J Med Internet Res</source>
                    <year>2011</year>
                    <volume>13</volume>
                    <fpage>e68</fpage>
                    <comment>
                        <ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="http://www.jmir.org/2011/3/e68/" />
                    </comment>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2196/jmir.1241</pub-id>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="medline">21946048</pub-id>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="pii">v13i3e68</pub-id>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC3222165</pub-id>
                </nlm-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref15">
                <label>15</label>
                <nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Hohw&#252;</surname>
                            <given-names>L</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Lyshol</surname>
                            <given-names>H</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Gissler</surname>
                            <given-names>M</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Jonsson</surname>
                            <given-names>SH</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Petzold</surname>
                            <given-names>M</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Obel</surname>
                            <given-names>C</given-names>
                        </name>
                    </person-group>
                    <article-title>Web-based versus traditional paper questionnaires: a mixed-mode survey with a Nordic perspective</article-title>
                    <source>J Med Internet Res</source>
                    <year>2013</year>
                    <volume>15</volume>
                    <fpage>e173</fpage>
                    <comment>
                        <ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="http://www.jmir.org/2013/8/e173/" />
                    </comment>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2196/jmir.2595</pub-id>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="medline">23978658</pub-id>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="pii">v15i8e173</pub-id>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC3757995</pub-id>
                </nlm-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref16">
                <label>16</label>
                <nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Smyth</surname>
                            <given-names>JD</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Olson</surname>
                            <given-names>K</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Millar</surname>
                            <given-names>MM</given-names>
                        </name>
                    </person-group>
                    <article-title>Identifying predictors of survey mode preference</article-title>
                    <source>Soc Sci Res</source>
                    <year>2014</year>
                    <volume>48</volume>
                    <fpage>135</fpage>
                    <lpage>144</lpage>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ssresearch.2014.06.002</pub-id>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="medline">25131280</pub-id>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="pii">S0049-089X(14)00126-4</pub-id>
                </nlm-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref17">
                <label>17</label>
                <nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Clay</surname>
                            <given-names>MG</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Hislop</surname>
                            <given-names>TG</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Kan</surname>
                            <given-names>L</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Olivotto</surname>
                            <given-names>IA</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Burhenne</surname>
                            <given-names>LJ</given-names>
                        </name>
                    </person-group>
                    <article-title>Screening mammography in British Columbia: 1988-1993</article-title>
                    <source>Am J Surg</source>
                    <year>1994</year>
                    <volume>167</volume>
                    <issue>5</issue>
                    <fpage>490</fpage>
                    <lpage>492</lpage>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="medline">8185033</pub-id>
                </nlm-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref18">
                <label>18</label>
                <nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Jacobi</surname>
                            <given-names>CE</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>de Bock</surname>
                            <given-names>GH</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Siegerink</surname>
                            <given-names>B</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>van Asperen</surname>
                            <given-names>CJ</given-names>
                        </name>
                    </person-group>
                    <article-title>Differences and similarities in breast cancer risk assessment models in clinical practice: which model to choose?</article-title>
                    <source>Breast Cancer Res Treat</source>
                    <year>2009</year>
                    <volume>115</volume>
                    <fpage>381</fpage>
                    <lpage>390</lpage>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10549-008-0070-x</pub-id>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="medline">18516672</pub-id>
                </nlm-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref19">
                <label>19</label>
                <nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Powell</surname>
                            <given-names>M</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Jamshidian</surname>
                            <given-names>F</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Cheyne</surname>
                            <given-names>K</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Nititham</surname>
                            <given-names>J</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Prebil</surname>
                            <given-names>LA</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Ereman</surname>
                            <given-names>R</given-names>
                        </name>
                    </person-group>
                    <article-title>Assessing breast cancer risk models in Marin County, a population with high rates of delayed childbirth</article-title>
                    <source>Clin Breast Cancer</source>
                    <year>2014</year>
                    <volume>14</volume>
                    <fpage>212</fpage>
                    <lpage>220.e1</lpage>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.clbc.2013.11.003</pub-id>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="medline">24461459</pub-id>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="pii">S1526-8209(13)00285-1</pub-id>
                </nlm-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref20">
                <label>20</label>
                <nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Weisstock</surname>
                            <given-names>CR</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Rajapakshe</surname>
                            <given-names>R</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Bitgood</surname>
                            <given-names>C</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>McAvoy</surname>
                            <given-names>S</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Gordon</surname>
                            <given-names>PB</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Coldman</surname>
                            <given-names>AJ</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Parker</surname>
                            <given-names>BA</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Wilson</surname>
                            <given-names>C</given-names>
                        </name>
                    </person-group>
                    <article-title>Assessing the breast cancer risk distribution for women undergoing screening in British Columbia</article-title>
                    <source>Cancer Prev Res (Phila)</source>
                    <year>2013</year>
                    <volume>6</volume>
                    <fpage>1084</fpage>
                    <lpage>1092</lpage>
                    <comment>
                        <ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="http://cancerpreventionresearch.aacrjournals.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&#38;pmid=23963801" />
                    </comment>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-13-0027</pub-id>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="medline">23963801</pub-id>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="pii">1940-6207.CAPR-13-0027</pub-id>
                </nlm-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref21">
                <label>21</label>
                <nlm-citation citation-type="web">
                    <source>BC Cancer Agency - Centre for the Southern Interior</source>
                    <access-date>2015-08-07</access-date>
                    <comment>Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Project<ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="http://www.breastcancerrisk.ca/">http://www.breastcancerrisk.ca/</ext-link>
                        <ext-link ext-link-type="webcite" xlink:href="6ac7gJKhE" />
                    </comment>
                </nlm-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref22">
                <label>22</label>
                <nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Evans</surname>
                            <given-names>DG</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Warwick</surname>
                            <given-names>J</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Astley</surname>
                            <given-names>SM</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Stavrinos</surname>
                            <given-names>P</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Sahin</surname>
                            <given-names>S</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Ingham</surname>
                            <given-names>S</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>McBurney</surname>
                            <given-names>H</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Eckersley</surname>
                            <given-names>B</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Harvie</surname>
                            <given-names>M</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Wilson</surname>
                            <given-names>M</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Beetles</surname>
                            <given-names>U</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Warren</surname>
                            <given-names>R</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Hufton</surname>
                            <given-names>A</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Sergeant</surname>
                            <given-names>JC</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Newman</surname>
                            <given-names>WG</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Buchan</surname>
                            <given-names>I</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Cuzick</surname>
                            <given-names>J</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Howell</surname>
                            <given-names>A</given-names>
                        </name>
                    </person-group>
                    <article-title>Assessing individual breast cancer risk within the U.K. National Health Service Breast Screening Program: a new paradigm for cancer prevention</article-title>
                    <source>Cancer Prev Res (Phila)</source>
                    <year>2012</year>
                    <volume>5</volume>
                    <fpage>943</fpage>
                    <lpage>951</lpage>
                    <comment>
                        <ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="http://cancerpreventionresearch.aacrjournals.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&#38;pmid=22581816" />
                    </comment>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-11-0458</pub-id>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="medline">22581816</pub-id>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="pii">1940-6207.CAPR-11-0458</pub-id>
                </nlm-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref23">
                <label>23</label>
                <nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Olson</surname>
                            <given-names>K</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Smyth</surname>
                            <given-names>JD</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Wood</surname>
                            <given-names>HM</given-names>
                        </name>
                    </person-group>
                    <article-title>Does Giving People Their Preferred Survey Mode Actually Increase Survey Participation Rates? An Experimental Examination</article-title>
                    <source>Public Opinion Quarterly</source>
                    <year>2012</year>
                    <volume>76</volume>
                    <fpage>611</fpage>
                    <lpage>635</lpage>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/poq/nfs024</pub-id>
                </nlm-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref24">
                <label>24</label>
                <nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Porter</surname>
                            <given-names>CE</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Donthu</surname>
                            <given-names>N</given-names>
                        </name>
                    </person-group>
                    <article-title>Using the technology acceptance model to explain how attitudes determine Internet usage: The role of perceived access barriers and demographics</article-title>
                    <source>Journal of Business Research</source>
                    <year>2006</year>
                    <volume>59</volume>
                    <fpage>999</fpage>
                    <lpage>1007</lpage>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.06.003</pub-id>
                </nlm-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref25">
                <label>25</label>
                <nlm-citation citation-type="web">
                    <source>Pew Research Center</source>
                    <access-date>2015-08-06</access-date>
                    <comment>Internet Use Over Time<ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="http://www.pewinternet.org/data-trend/internet-use/internet-use-over-time/">http://www.pewinternet.org/data-trend/internet-use/internet-use-over-time/</ext-link>
                        <ext-link ext-link-type="webcite" xlink:href="6ac9FFk2i" />
                    </comment>
                </nlm-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref26">
                <label>26</label>
                <nlm-citation citation-type="web">
                    <source>Pew Research Center</source>
                    <access-date>2015-08-05</access-date>
                    <comment>Internet User Demographics<ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="http://www.pewinternet.org/data-trend/internet-use/latest-stats/">http://www.pewinternet.org/data-trend/internet-use/latest-stats/</ext-link>
                        <ext-link ext-link-type="webcite" xlink:href="6ac9X0H14" />
                    </comment>
                </nlm-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref27">
                <label>27</label>
                <nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Horevoorts</surname>
                            <given-names>NJ</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Vissers</surname>
                            <given-names>PA</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Mols</surname>
                            <given-names>F</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Thong</surname>
                            <given-names>MS</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>van de Poll-Franse</surname>
                            <given-names>LV</given-names>
                        </name>
                    </person-group>
                    <article-title>Response rates for patient-reported outcomes using web-based versus paper questionnaires: comparison of two invitational methods in older colorectal cancer patients</article-title>
                    <source>J Med Internet Res</source>
                    <year>2015</year>
                    <volume>17</volume>
                    <fpage>e111</fpage>
                    <comment>
                        <ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="http://www.jmir.org/2015/5/e111/" />
                    </comment>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2196/jmir.3741</pub-id>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="medline">25953059</pub-id>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="pii">v17i5e111</pub-id>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC4468744</pub-id>
                </nlm-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref28">
                <label>28</label>
                <nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Klovning</surname>
                            <given-names>A</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Sandvik</surname>
                            <given-names>H</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Hunskaar</surname>
                            <given-names>S</given-names>
                        </name>
                    </person-group>
                    <article-title>Web-based survey attracted age-biased sample with more severe illness than paper-based survey</article-title>
                    <source>J Clin Epidemiol</source>
                    <year>2009</year>
                    <volume>62</volume>
                    <fpage>1068</fpage>
                    <lpage>1074</lpage>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.10.015</pub-id>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="medline">19246177</pub-id>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="pii">S0895-4356(08)00328-4</pub-id>
                </nlm-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref29">
                <label>29</label>
                <nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Berry</surname>
                            <given-names>DL</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Blonquist</surname>
                            <given-names>TM</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Patel</surname>
                            <given-names>RA</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Halpenny</surname>
                            <given-names>B</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>McReynolds</surname>
                            <given-names>J</given-names>
                        </name>
                    </person-group>
                    <article-title>Exposure to a patient-centered, Web-based intervention for managing cancer symptom and quality of life issues: impact on symptom distress</article-title>
                    <source>J Med Internet Res</source>
                    <year>2015</year>
                    <volume>17</volume>
                    <fpage>e136</fpage>
                    <comment>
                        <ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="http://www.jmir.org/2015/6/e136/" />
                    </comment>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2196/jmir.4190</pub-id>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="medline">26041682</pub-id>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="pii">v17i6e136</pub-id>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC4526904</pub-id>
                </nlm-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref30">
                <label>30</label>
                <nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Barentsz</surname>
                            <given-names>MW</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Wessels</surname>
                            <given-names>H</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>van Diest</surname>
                            <given-names>PJ</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Pijnappel</surname>
                            <given-names>RM</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Haaring</surname>
                            <given-names>C</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>van der Pol</surname>
                            <given-names>CC</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Witkamp</surname>
                            <given-names>AJ</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>van den Bosch</surname>
                            <given-names>MA</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Verkooijen</surname>
                            <given-names>HM</given-names>
                        </name>
                    </person-group>
                    <article-title>Tablet, web-based, or paper questionnaires for measuring anxiety in patients suspected of breast cancer: patients' preferences and quality of collected data</article-title>
                    <source>J Med Internet Res</source>
                    <year>2014</year>
                    <volume>16</volume>
                    <fpage>e239</fpage>
                    <comment>
                        <ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="http://www.jmir.org/2014/10/e239/" />
                    </comment>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2196/jmir.3578</pub-id>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="medline">25364951</pub-id>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="pii">v16i10e239</pub-id>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC4259914</pub-id>
                </nlm-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref31">
                <label>31</label>
                <nlm-citation citation-type="web">
                    <source>Allen M</source>
                    <access-date>2015-08-10</access-date>
                    <comment>Insights on Canadian Society: Consumption of culture by older Canadians on the internet<ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/75-006-x/2013001/article/11768-eng.htm">http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/75-006-x/2013001/article/11768-eng.htm</ext-link>
                        <ext-link ext-link-type="webcite" xlink:href="6agiLwMmH" />
                    </comment>
                </nlm-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref32">
                <label>32</label>
                <nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Sykes</surname>
                            <given-names>LL</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Walker</surname>
                            <given-names>RL</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Ngwakongnwi</surname>
                            <given-names>E</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Quan</surname>
                            <given-names>H</given-names>
                        </name>
                    </person-group>
                    <article-title>A systematic literature review on response rates across racial and ethnic populations</article-title>
                    <source>Can J Public Health</source>
                    <year>2010</year>
                    <volume>101</volume>
                    <fpage>213</fpage>
                    <lpage>219</lpage>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="medline">20737812</pub-id>
                </nlm-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref33">
                <label>33</label>
                <nlm-citation citation-type="web">
                    <source>Statistics Canada</source>
                    <access-date>2015-11-28</access-date>
                    <comment>The Daily: Canada&#039;s Population Estimates: Age and Sex, July 1, 2015<ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="http://www.statcan.gc.ca/daily-quotidien/150929/dq150929b-eng.pdf">http://www.statcan.gc.ca/daily-quotidien/150929/dq150929b-eng.pdf</ext-link>
                        <ext-link ext-link-type="webcite" xlink:href="6dNzHf4V4" />
                    </comment>
                </nlm-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref34">
                <label>34</label>
                <nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Onega</surname>
                            <given-names>T</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Beaber</surname>
                            <given-names>EF</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Sprague</surname>
                            <given-names>BL</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Barlow</surname>
                            <given-names>WE</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Haas</surname>
                            <given-names>JS</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Tosteson</surname>
                            <given-names>AN</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Armstrong</surname>
                            <given-names>K</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Schapira</surname>
                            <given-names>MM</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Geller</surname>
                            <given-names>B</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Weaver</surname>
                            <given-names>DL</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Conant</surname>
                            <given-names>EF</given-names>
                        </name>
                    </person-group>
                    <article-title>Breast cancer screening in an era of personalized regimens: a conceptual model and National Cancer Institute initiative for risk-based and preference-based approaches at a population level</article-title>
                    <source>Cancer</source>
                    <year>2014</year>
                    <volume>120</volume>
                    <fpage>2955</fpage>
                    <lpage>2964</lpage>
                    <comment>
                        <ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.28771" />
                    </comment>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/cncr.28771</pub-id>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="medline">24830599</pub-id>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC4342235</pub-id>
                </nlm-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref35">
                <label>35</label>
                <nlm-citation citation-type="web">
                    <source>Statistics Canada</source>
                    <access-date>2015-11-27</access-date>
                    <comment>Population and Demography<ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/11-402-x/2012000/chap/pop/pop-eng.htm?fpv=3867">http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/11-402-x/2012000/chap/pop/pop-eng.htm?fpv=3867</ext-link>
                        <ext-link ext-link-type="webcite" xlink:href="6dNzQ1lu2" />
                    </comment>
                </nlm-citation>
            </ref>
        </ref-list>
    </back>
</article>