This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
Background
Due to mixed findings in research on the effect of online peer-to-peer support on psychological well-being, there is a need for studies explaining why and when online support communities are beneficial for cancer patients.
Objective
Previous studies have typically not taken into account individual coping differences, despite the fact that patients have different strategies to cope with cancer-related emotions. In the current study, it was predicted that the effects of online support group participation would partly depend on patients’ ability to cope with thoughts and emotions regarding the illness.
Methods
For this study, 184 Dutch breast cancer patients filled out a questionnaire assessing activity within a peer-led online support community, coping with emotions and thoughts regarding the illness (cognitive avoidance, emotional processing, and expression) and psychological well-being (depression, breast cancer-related concerns, and emotional well-being). Of these, 163 patients were visiting an online peer-led support community.
Results
Results showed interactions of the intensity of support group participation and coping style on psychological well-being. Specifically, we found an interaction of online activity and emotional expression on depression (beta=–.17, P=.030), a marginally significant interaction of online activity and emotional expression on emotional well-being (beta=.14, P=.089), and an interaction of online activity and cognitive avoidance on breast cancer–related concerns (beta=.15, P=.027). For patients who actively dealt with their emotions and thoughts, active online support group participation was positively related to psychological well-being. For patients high on avoidance of illness-related thoughts or low on emotional expression, active participation was negatively related to measures of well-being.
Conclusions
The current study revealed the role of individual differences in coping in online support group participation. Results suggest that breast cancer patients’ ability to cope with emotions and thoughts regarding the illness influence the relationship between online support group participation and psychological well-being.
As in other countries, the number of newly diagnosed breast cancer patients in the Netherlands has increased in recent years (up 18% between 2000 and 2010; 13,357 new patients in 2010) and is expected to rise because of the extended life span of the population, the early detection of breast cancer, and the increasing effectiveness of treatment [1]. A greater number of patients are turning to the Internet for support and for information about health-related issues [2,3]. Research has shown that breast cancer patients are among the most active seekers of online social support compared to other patient groups [4]. Several studies have set out to reveal the effects of online peer support on psychological well-being, showing mixed findings [5-7]. For example, some studies revealed positive outcomes, such as decreased depression, reactions to pain, cancer-related trauma, and distress [8-10]. Other studies found no increase in well-being [11,12] or reported negative associations or effects [13,14].
These mixed findings may stem from the fact that most outcome studies assess online support interventions set up by professionals. These interventions often include other therapeutic elements besides peer support, which makes it hard to disentangle the effects of solely the online peer support [6]. Studies testing the effects of peer-led online support communities are underrepresented in the literature, even though these communities are common and easily accessible online. One reason might be that testing the effects of participating in peer-led communities is complicated due to its uncontrolled setting. Therefore, studies examining these peer-led groups are largely qualitative or descriptive in nature and suggest the presence of empowering processes, such as emotional and informational support, emotional expression, advice, recognition, understanding, and insight [15-19]. However, follow-up research is needed to assess the relationship between these therapeutic processes and health outcomes. Therefore, the first goal of our research was to provide a quantitative test of the relationship between participation and well-being in peer-led support groups.
Another reason for mixed findings in outcome studies is the individual differences between patients. Although descriptive studies suggest therapeutic processes at work within online support communities, these processes may not apply equally to all patients. Some patients only read stories from others, while others share experiences, thoughts, emotions, ask questions, or support others [20]. Although patients have the opportunity to disclose their feelings and read about the experiences and emotions of others online, not every patient approaches emotions equally. Previous descriptive studies show a large variety in content of online messages, from emotional experiences to illness to unrelated chitchat [21,22]. Furthermore, studies using a word counting program have shown that there are variations in individual writing styles and that these variations are related to health outcomes. For example, greater expression of negative emotions, cognitive processing, and lower expression of health-related concerns was positively associated with quality of life variables [11], and words suggestive of learning or understanding improved emotional well-being, functional well-being, health self-efficacy, and reduced negative mood [23]. Thus far, individual differences in how patients cope with thoughts and emotions have not been connected to potential effects of support group participation. A second goal of the present study therefore was to examine the relationship between peer-led support group participation, individual differences in coping behavior, and measures of well-being.
The intensity of support group use and how patients disclose thoughts and emotions depend to a large extent on individual coping styles. From offline studies, we know that some breast cancer patients approach the illness actively by processing and expressing their emotions [24], while others try to avoid all thoughts and emotions related to the illness [25]. The tendency to approach thoughts and emotions can be categorized on three levels of emotional engagement: (1) cognitive avoidance: the patient tries to avoid all thoughts and emotions related to the illness [26], (2) emotional processing: the attempt to acknowledge and understand feelings, but not necessarily the expression of emotions [24,27], and (3) emotional expression: individuals not only acknowledge their emotions but also allow themselves to express them [24]. Several studies have shown that the use of a cognitive avoidant coping style is negatively related to adjustment to cancer [28], health status [29], and is positively related to higher distress levels [25,30]. In contrast, actively dealing with thoughts and emotions regarding breast cancer showed a positive relationship with psychological and physical well-being, such as decreased depressive symptoms, distress, increased vigor, improved perceived health status, and fewer medical appointments [24,31-33]. Therefore, consistent with the coping literature, we expect that patients who score relatively high on avoidance coping will report a lower sense of well-being than patients who show less avoidant behavior. In contrast, patients who actively approach their emotions are expected to report a better sense of well-being than patients who approach emotions less actively.
Although one would expect that patients participating in an online support community are willing to confront illness-related information and therefore cope with their emotions and thoughts quite actively, a certain degree of online avoidance, processing, and expression might influence patients’ well-being. Based on previous findings, it seems plausible to assume that active online support group participation may positively affect well-being in particular for patients who score low on cognitive avoidance and high on emotional processing and expression coping, because these patients are likely to benefit most from interactions with peers. Therefore, we suggest that coping styles are not only directly related to psychological well-being, but they also moderate the relationship between online support group participation and psychological well-being.
Due to the lack of studies on peer-led online support groups, we conducted a study on Dutch online communities set up by patients and former patients. Because previous mixed findings in research might partly have been caused by individual differences, this is the first attempt to include patients’ coping style regarding illness-related thoughts and emotions. Although psychological research has extensively shown the relationship between coping styles and health outcomes [25,27-33], to our knowledge no study has assessed this relationship in the context of online peer support. We conducted our online study among Dutch breast cancer patients to measure the intensity of their online support group participation, coping style, cognitive avoidance, emotional processing, and emotional expression, as well as three measures of well-being generally associated with breast cancer diagnosis: emotional well-being, depression, and breast cancer-related concerns [34-36]. We also included additional factors in our analyses often associated with the psychological well-being of breast cancer patients, such as social support from family and friends [37,38], illness stage, and professional psychological help received. We hypothesized that active online support group participation would be positively related to emotional well-being and negatively related to depression and breast cancer-related concerns in particular for patients who scored low on cognitive avoidance and high on emotional processing and expression.
MethodsParticipants and Procedure
We used Google to identify all online support communities for breast cancer patients in the Netherlands. Criteria for inclusion were that (1) the website was in the Dutch language, (2) the support group (sometimes part of a more extensive website) was designed as a peer-led message board available 24/7, and (3) the discussion board was still active (the last month’s new messages had been posted). With approval of the website owners, a request to participate in an online survey about breast cancer patients’ Internet use was posted on seven support websites (June 2011). This survey was part of a more extensive research project on online peer support among Dutch breast cancer patients. The research was carried out in accordance with the American Psychological Association’s ethics guidelines [39] and complies with European Union legislation [40] and Dutch legislation [41] on data protection.
The introduction page (ie, the first page of the survey) included the length and purpose of the survey, ensured anonymity, and contact information of the investigator (in case participants had any questions). The first page of the survey was viewed 311 times, and 184 Dutch breast cancer patients filled out the questionnaire (182 females and 2 males). Response rates are unknown because we had no access to page views of the participating websites. The online survey tool tracked IP (Internet protocol) addresses to prevent users from re-taking the survey. Responses to questions were obligatory, but participants were provided with an “I don’t know” or “not applicable” option.
Since males were underrepresented, we decided to exclude them from data analysis. Another 7 participants were excluded, due to extreme responses on one of the dependent variables (SD>3). Therefore, 175 participants were included in data analysis. Table 1 shows the demographics and patient characteristics of the study sample. Table 2 shows the average use of the peer support message board.
Demographics and health characteristics (N=175).
Characteristics
n
%
Age
Mean (SD)
48.09 (9.04)
Minimum
23
Maximum
71
Educationa
Elementary school
5
2.9
Secondary education
Low
29
16.6
Middle
15
8.6
High
2
1.1
Tertiary education
Lowb
10
5.7
Middle
47
26.9
High
55
31.4
Scientific degree
12
6.9
Working status
Not working
90
51.4
Working
85
48.6
Illness stage
No cancer cells at the moment
27
15.4
Stage I (tumor smaller than 2 cm, no metastases to the lymph nodes)
41
23.4
Stage II (metastases to the lymph nodes in the armpit, or a tumor larger than 2 cm with no metastases)
42
24.0
Stage III (metastases to multiple lymph nodes or other lymph nodes)
25
14.3
Stage IV (metastases to other body parts)
16
9.1
Unknown
24
13.7
Psychological help during period of illness
Yes
69
39.4
No
106
60.6
aLevels within the Dutch education system: education is divided over three schools for different age groups, which are divided in streams for different educational levels.
bDutch educational structure “LBO/LTS” existed until 1992.
Use of the online support community (N=175).
Frequency of use
n
%
Not visiting an online BC support message board
12
6.9
Frequency of visits (n=163)
<1 per month
19
11.7
Approximately once a month
12
7.4
Multiple times per month
12
7.4
Approximately once a week
17
10.4
Multiple times per week
22
13.5
Approximately once a day
44
27.0
Multiple times per day
37
22.7
Frequency of posts the last 4 weeks (n=163)
None
61
37.4
≤1 per week
39
23.9
Multiple posts per week, but not every day
45
27.6
Every day one post or more
18
11.0
Forum contribution (n=163)
I only read posts from others
36
22.1
I reacted on post(s) of someone else
28
17.1
I started a new topic or asked a question
18
11.0
I both started a new topic or asked a question AND I reacted on post(s) of another
81
49.7
Average length of visits (n=163)
<10 minutes
61
37.4
10-30 minutes
71
43.6
30 minutes to 1 hour
22
13.5
>1 hour
9
5.5
MeasurementsOnline Support Group Participation
The intensity of online support group participation was assessed by four different questions regarding frequency of visits, average length of visits, contribution, and frequency of posts in the last 4 weeks (cf [42]). Frequency of visits was assessed on a 7-point scale; the other items were assessed on a 4-point scale (Table 2). To merge these different scales into one index, all items were transformed into Z scores (Cronbach alpha=.77).
Emotional Coping
The Dutch mini-MAC [24] was used to assess cognitive avoidance (4 items, eg, “I try not to think about my illness”). Participants rated on a 4-point scale if the statements applied to them. Ratings were summed and averaged across items. Higher scores indicated that the coping style of cognitive avoidance applied to them. The scale was internally consistent (Cronbach alpha=.82).
The Emotional Approach Coping scale [22] was used to measure emotional processing and emotional expression. Four items measured emotional expression (eg, “I take the time to express my emotions”; Cronbach alpha=.86). Another four items measured emotional processing (eg, “I realize that my feelings are justified and important”; Cronbach alpha=.69). Participants rated on a 4-point scale if the statements applied to them. Ratings were summed and averaged across items. The variables indicating the intensity of support group participation and coping styles were unrelated.
Psychological Well-Being
Three different scales measured psychological well-being. First we measured depression using the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D10) [43]. The scale consisted of 10 items (eg, “I felt that everything I did took me quite a lot of effort”). Participants rated on a 4-point scale if the statements applied to them the last week, from “less than one day” to “5 to 7 days”. Ratings were summed and averaged across items. Higher scores indicated more depression-related thoughts. The scale was internally consistent: Cronbach alpha=.72. Additionally, we measured breast cancer-related concerns [44] with 28 items (eg, “Are you concerned that your friends will avoid you?”; Cronbach alpha=.89). Participants answered these questions on a 5-point scale, ranging from “Not at all” to “Totally”. Higher scores indicated more concerns regarding the illness. Emotional well-being was measured according to 6 items from the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy questionnaire (FACIT-B) [45] (Cronbach alpha=.81). An item example is “I feel sad”. Respondents rated on a 5-point scale if the statements applied to them, ranging from “Not at all” to “Totally”. Higher scores indicated a better sense of emotional well-being.
Control Variables
Last, we measured participants’ age, education level, current working status (ie, if they were currently working), illness stage (the standard four phases in breast cancer [46]), psychological help (ie, if they received psychological help from a professional), and offline social support (based on the six “Social well-being” items from the FACIT-B [45]). Items referring to support from friends were adjusted into items that clearly referred to their offline friends, not online peers. Respondents rated on a 5-point scale if the statements applied to them, ranging from “Not at all” to “Totally” (Cronbach alpha=.94).
ResultsCorrelations
Tables 3 and 4 show the correlations between all variables. Cognitive avoidance coping was associated with all three psychological well-being variables: positively with depression and breast cancer–related concerns and negatively with emotional well-being. Emotional processing was not related to psychological well-being. Emotional expression was negatively related to depression. No direct associations between support group participation and one of the psychological well-being variables were found.
We tested the hypothesized relationship between online support group participation, coping styles, and psychological well-being with regression analyses. All independent variables were standardized into Z scores to meet the requirements to perform regression analyses and to compute interaction terms. In addition, every model included the covariates that were significantly correlated to the dependent variable (ie, depression, emotional well-being, breast cancer-related concerns). We examined interactions for participants with relative low scores (1 SD below the mean of the standardized score) and for participants with relative high scores (1 SD above the mean of the standardized score) on the continuous indices measuring intensity of online participation and coping styles (see [47] for this regression analysis).
Means, standard deviations, and intercorrelations of independent variables, illness stage, age, and dependent variables.
Variables
n
M
SD
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
Support group participationa
163
–0.01
0.78
–
2
Cognitive avoidance
175
1.95
0.60
.03
–
3
Emotional processing
174
2.86
0.50
.01
–.10
–
4
Emotional expression
174
2.79
0.54
.07
–.16d
.57c
–
5
Illness stage
151
2.75
1.23
.23c
.06
–.08
–.09
–
6
Age
175
48.09
9.04
–.24c
–.02
–.03
.02
–.01
–
7
Education
175
6.40
1.93
.01
–.13
.09
.03
.11
–.26c
8
Working statusb
175
0.49
0.81
–0.12
.01
–.08
–.14
–.13
–.20c
9
Offline social support
175
3.78
0.60
.03
–.18
–.02
.18d
–.03
–.05
10
Psychological helpb
175
0.39
0.49
–.06
.11
.15
–.04
.00
–.22c
11
Depression
175
1.83
0.45
.01
.36c
.05
–.15d
.04
–.06
12
Breast cancer-related concerns
175
2.64
0.55
.08
.35c
.03
–.02
.07
–.18d
13
Emotional well-being
175
3.53
0.77
–.02
–.47c
–.06
.06
–.20d
.04
aStandardized into Z scores.
bCoded 0=no, 1=yes.
cCorrelations significant at the .01 level.
dCorrelations significant at the .05 level.
Means, standard deviations, and intercorrelations of education level, working status, psychological, and offline support, and dependent variables.
Variables
n
M
SD
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
Support group participationa
163
–0.01
0.78
2
Cognitive avoidance
175
1.95
0.60
3
Emotional processing
174
2.86
0.50
4
Emotional expression
174
2.79
0.54
5
Illness stage
151
2.75
1.23
6
Age
175
48.09
9.04
7
Education
175
6.40
1.93
–
8
Working statusb
175
0.49
0.81
.27c
–
9
Offline social support
175
3.78
0.60
.15d
.09
–
10
Psychological helpb
175
0.39
0.49
.13
.13
–.18d
–
11
Depression
175
1.83
0.45
–.13
–.17d
–.36c
.24c
–
12
Breast cancer-related concerns
175
2.64
0.55
–.09
–.19d
–.44c
.18d
.43c
–
13
Emotional well-being
175
3.53
0.77
.04
.20c
.32c
–.18d
–.56c
–.49c
aStandardized into Z scores.
bCoded 0=no, 1=yes.
cCorrelations significant at the .01 level.
dCorrelations significant at the .05 level.
Depression
Regression results (Table 5) indicated a main effect of working status, psychological help, offline social support, cognitive avoidance, and a marginally significant effect of emotional expression on depression. No main effects of the intensity of support group participation and emotional processing were found. The higher that patients scored on cognitive avoidance, the more depressive feelings they reported. In contrast, emotional expression was negatively related to depression. Furthermore, an interaction effect of emotional expression and intensity of support group participation was found.
For patients expressing their emotions, intensity of online support group participation was associated with less depressive feelings. In contrast, for patients who scored low on emotional expression, online activity was associated with more depressive feelings (Figure 1). No other interaction effects on depression were observed.
Hierarchical regression results for the effects of support group participation and coping style on depression, emotional well-being, and breast cancer–related concerns.
Depression (n=162)
Emotional well-being
(n=141)
Breast cancer concerns
(n=162)
Variable
b (SE)
ß
P
b (SE)
ß
P
b (SE)
ß
P
Step 1: Covariates
Working statusa
–0.13 (0.06)
–.14
.047
0.20 (0.11)
.13
.072
–0.22 (0.07)
–.20
.003
Psychological helpa
0.14 (0.07)
.15
.039
–0.14 (.12)
–.88
.245
0.10 (0.08)
.09
.205
Offline social support
–0.10 (0.03)
–.23
.002
0.11 (0.06)
.15
.045
–0.22 (0.04)
–.42
<.001
Illness stage
–
–
–
–0.13 (0.06)
–.17
.023
–
–
–
Age
–
–
–
–
–
–
–0.14 (0.04)
–.25
<.001
Step 2: Main effects
(A) Support group participation
0.01 (0.03)
.02
.748
–0.02 (0.06)
–.02
.778
0.03 (0.04)
.05
.459
(B) Cognitive avoidance
0.13 (0.03)
.28
.000
–0.37 (0.06)
–.47
<.001
0.14 (0.04)
.27
<.001
(C) Emotional processing
0.05 (0.04)
.11
.220
–0.07 (0.07)
–.09
.312
–0.07 (0.05)
–.12
.159
(D) Emotional expression
–0.07 (0.04)
–.16
.067
0.04 (0.07)
.05
.603
0.05 (0.04)
.09
.290
Step 3: Interaction effects
A x B
–0.03 (0.03)
–.08
.273
–0.02 (0.05)
–.03
.709
0.07 (0.03)
.15
.027
A x C
–0.01 (0.04)
–.02
.856
0.09 (0.07)
.11
.167
–0.03 (0.04)
–.05
.529
A x D
–0.08 (0.04)
–.17
.030
0.10 (0.06)
.14
.089b
–0.02 (0.04)
–.03
.671
R2
.31
.39
.41
ANOVA
F10,151=6741
<.001
F11,129=7500
<.001
F11,150=9309
<.001
Adjusted R2
.26
.34
.36
Cohen’s f2
0.45
0.64
0.69
aCoded 0=no, 1=yes.
bThis marginally significant effect may be due to a smaller sample (n=141) caused by incomplete scores regarding the covariate illness stage; the interaction is significant without the inclusion of illness stage, b(SE)=0.17(.07), ß=.17, P=.02, n=162.
Interactions of the intensity of online support group participation and coping style on depression, emotional well-being, and breast cancer-related concerns (psychological well-being: Y-axis shows the absolute score; intensity of online participation and coping style: Low=1 standard deviation below the mean; High=1 standard deviation above the mean).
Emotional Well-Being
Offline social support, illness stage, and cognitive avoidance showed a main effect on emotional well-being. No main effects of intensity of online support group participation and the other coping styles were found. Again, the more patients avoided thoughts, the worse their sense of well-being. Furthermore, a marginally significant interaction between emotional expression and support group participation was found (Table 4).
Results tentatively suggest that for patients low on emotional expression, being more active in an online support group was negatively associated with emotional well-being. For patients who expressed their emotions, the intensity of online support group participation was positively related to emotional well-being (Figure 1). No other interaction effects were observed on emotional well-being.
Breast Cancer–Related Concerns
Results showed a main effect of working status, offline social support, age, and cognitive avoidance. No main effects of intensity of online participation or the other coping styles were found. Additionally, an interaction between cognitive avoidance and support group participation on breast cancer–related concerns was found (Table 4). Patients who were rather active online and tried to avoid thoughts about their illness had more breast cancer–related concerns than active patients who scored low on cognitive avoidance (Figure 1). No other interaction effects were found.
DiscussionPrincipal Findings
The present cross-sectional study tested the interaction of online support group participation and coping styles concerning illness-related thoughts and emotions on psychological well-being. The expected interaction was found on several occasions. Specifically, results suggest that patients coping with their illness by expressing their emotions may benefit more from online support group participation than patients who approach or acknowledge their emotions less. For patients who approached their emotions, active participation was positively related to emotional well-being and negatively related to depression. For patients who scored low on emotional expression, however, active participation was related to higher levels of depression and lower levels of emotional well-being. Finally, for patients who were more avoidant, the intensity of online support group participation was related to higher levels of breast cancer–related concerns, compared to patients who were less avoidant. These findings support the assumption that the relationship between online support group participation and well-being might be influenced by individual differences in coping styles. The current results suggest that active online support group participation may be more beneficial for individuals expressing their thoughts and emotions.
A potential explanation for the negative relation between the intensity of online participation and breast cancer-related concerns among patients with a more avoidant coping style is that these patients may be less able to cope with the negative content on online forums; they may be overwhelmed by the sad and frightening stories from patients in the same condition. In some online support group interview studies, patients mentioned having difficulties being confronted with negative sides of the disease [21,48], and some even withdrew to avoid painful details about cancer [49]. Previous research also showed that breast cancer patients use optimistic stories from peers as a source for inspiration [50]. Patients with an avoidant coping style may search for such positive stories but at the same time encounter negative stories they cannot cope with. Alternatively, patients with more concerns might be more active support seekers, but in turn also become more avoidant to be able to deal with their own extreme emotions and potentially distressing stories from online peers. Sometimes avoiding thoughts and emotions might be beneficial in order to prevent becoming overwhelmed with negative information from others. Since this study has a cross-sectional design, we cannot draw conclusions on the direction of the relationships we found. Therefore, there is a need for longitudinal studies on peer-led support groups, including patients’ coping styles. In addition, future research should focus on the content to reveal more insight into support group participation of patients with different coping styles, especially avoidant patients.
The present findings further previous research by showing that individual coping differences among online support seekers are likely to influence the relationship between online support group participation and psychological well-being. The current study might explain null findings in previous studies [11,12]. We found no direct relation between the intensity of participation and well-being, but we did find interactions of coping style and online participation on well-being. Support group participation may intensify certain positive processes that are already present in patients, such as the expression of emotions, but may also influence patients negatively when adaptive coping styles are less present. It is important to take these personal factors into account when we investigate the effectiveness of online support groups. Recently, studies have started looking into individual differences that may influence the effects of online support group participation. For example, a study showed different effects on emotional well-being depending on patients’ level of health self-efficacy [51].
Our findings also showed that other factors, such as illness stage and offline social support, were sometimes more related to psychological well-being than coping style or the interaction of support group participation and coping style. This underscores the importance of including “offline” factors that affect patients’ well-being when examining online support group effectiveness. Illness characteristics are often considered, but other factors outside the online support group that may influence well-being, such as support from friends and relatives or professional psychological help are often left out. Researchers should be careful not to exaggerate the effects of online peer support and distinguish effects directly caused by online participation, effects caused by other (offline) factors, and factors that could be strengthened by online support group participation (such as certain coping strategies). Future studies should also further examine the strength of these effects, as the effect sizes observed in the present research were rather modest.
Limitations and Future Research
A limitation of this research is the cross-sectional design, which warrants caution in interpreting the direction of causality. A longitudinal study is needed to test causal relationships. For example, it is possible that not being able to express one’s emotions negatively affects well-being and that this decreased well-being, in turn, prompts patients to become more active online in order to find support. From a modeling or skills perspective [52], active participation in online support communities may help patients with more repressive coping styles to learn over time how to positively approach their illness and express their emotions. The latter effects are more likely to surface in longitudinal studies that track patients over an extended period of time. Future studies should therefore test the causal directions of the presently observed relationship and also examine whether patients becoming more active online can be beneficial for patients with repressive coping styles in the longer run.
Furthermore, no interactions of emotional processing and online participation on psychological well-being were found. This can be explained by the suggestion of Stanton and colleagues [30] that the effect of emotional processing depends on its contribution to emotional expression. When thoughts and feelings are not expressed, they may become ruminative, which may negatively affect well-being. Considering that the effectiveness of approaching emotions depended on the expression of emotions—and not on processing emotions—the scale measuring emotional expression may be a more important determinant of well-being. Future research should look further into the interrelations between different, yet related, coping styles.
Finally, knowledge in this field may be extended by studying differences between forum users and non-users. Questions of interest include which patients decide to participate in these online support groups and whether non-users should at any time be encouraged to participate.
Conclusion
The current findings tentatively suggest that the effectiveness of online peer support is partly influenced by individual differences in coping style regarding thoughts and emotions. Patients who actively coped with their emotions and thoughts and participated actively within an online support community reported a better sense of psychological well-being than online active patients who coped less actively with their emotions. Although the current findings are cross-sectional, one plausible interpretation might be that patients who actively approach their emotions may benefit most from online support group participation, because online writing may reinforce the effectiveness of active coping styles. Since we found no direct relation between the intensity of online participation and psychological well-being, but several interactions between online activity and coping styles on well-being, patients’ initial coping abilities should be taken into account when examining the effectiveness of online peer support in future research.
AbbreviationsCES-D
Center for Epidemiological Studies—Depression Scale
FACIT
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy
SE
standard error
We would like to thank the website owners and patients for their support and participation.
None declared.
IKNL: Integraal kankercentrum NederlandCijfers over kanker - Prevalentie20132013-11-14http://www.cijfersoverkanker.nl/selecties/Dataset_2/img52849a55363ad6L7WkDhw2NaglerRHGraySWRomantanAKellyBJDeMicheleAArmstrongKSchwartzJSHornikRCDifferences in information seeking among breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer patients: results from a population-based surveyPatient Educ Couns20101281 SupplS546210.1016/j.pec.2010.09.01020934297S0738-3991(10)00558-6PMC2993788RiceREInfluences, usage, and outcomes of Internet health information searching: multivariate results from the Pew surveysInt J Med Inform20060175182810.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.07.03216125453S1386-5056(05)00146-2DavisonKPPennebakerJWDickersonSSWho talks? The social psychology of illness support groupsAm Psychol2000025522051710717968HongYPeña-PurcellNCOryMGOutcomes of online support and resources for cancer survivors: a systematic literature reviewPatient Educ Couns2012038632889610.1016/j.pec.2011.06.01421798685S0738-3991(11)00362-4EysenbachGPowellJEnglesakisMRizoCSternAHealth related virtual communities and electronic support groups: systematic review of the effects of online peer to peer interactionsBMJ200405153287449116610.1136/bmj.328.7449.116615142921328/7449/1166PMC411092KlemmPBunnellDCullenMSonejiRGibbonsPHolecekAOnline cancer support groups: a review of the research literatureComput Inform Nurs20032131364212792194LiebermanMAGolantMGiese-DavisJWinzlenbergABenjaminHHumphreysKKronenwetterCRussoSSpiegelDElectronic support groups for breast carcinoma: a clinical trial of effectivenessCancer20030215974920510.1002/cncr.1114512569591WinzelbergAJClassenCAlpersGWRobertsHKoopmanCAdamsREErnstHDevPTaylorCBEvaluation of an Internet support group for women with primary breast cancerCancer200303197511647310.1002/cncr.1117412599221HanJYShahDVKimENamkoongKLeeSYMoonTJClelandRBuQLMcTavishFMGustafsonDHEmpathic exchanges in online cancer support groups: distinguishing message expression and reception effectsHealth Commun2011032621859710.1080/10410236.2010.54428321318917933308503PMC3551338OwenJEKlapowJCRothDLShusterJLBellisJMeredithRTuckerDCRandomized pilot of a self-guided Internet coping group for women with early-stage breast cancerAnn Behav Med200508301546410.1207/s15324796abm3001_716097906HøybyeMTDaltonSODeltourIBidstrupPEFrederiksenKJohansenCEffect of Internet peer-support groups on psychosocial adjustment to cancer: a randomised studyBr J Cancer20100427102913485410.1038/sj.bjc.6605646204246146605646PMC2865756WinefieldHRCoventryBJPradhanMHarveyELambertVA comparison of women with breast cancer who do and do not seek support from the InternetAust J Psychol2003551304 10.1080/0004953041233131284SalzerMSPalmerSCKaplanKBrusilovskiyETen HaveTHampshireMMetzJCoyneJCA randomized, controlled study of Internet peer-to-peer interactions among women newly diagnosed with breast cancerPsychooncology201004194441610.1002/pon.158619484712FernslerJIManchesterLJEvaluation of a computer-based cancer support networkCancer Pract19975146519128496RodgersSChenQInternet community group participation: Psychosocial benefits for women with breast cancerJournal of Computer-Mediated Communication20051045 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00268.xvan Uden-KraanCFDrossaertCHTaalEShawBRSeydelERvan de LaarMAEmpowering processes and outcomes of participation in online support groups for patients with breast cancer, arthritis, or fibromyalgiaQual Health Res2008031834051710.1177/10497323073134291823516318/3/405SetoyamaYNakayamaKYamazakiYPeer support from online community on the internet among patients with breast cancer in JapanStud Health Technol Inform200914688619593035MoPKCoulsonNSExploring the communication of social support within virtual communities: a content analysis of messages posted to an online HIV/AIDS support groupCyberpsychol Behav200806113371410.1089/cpb.2007.011818537512SetoyamaYYamazakiYNamayamaKBenefits of peer support in online Japanese breast cancer communities: differences between lurkers and postersJ Med Internet Res2011134e12210.2196/jmir.169622204869v13i4e122PMC3278108van Uden-KraanCDrossaertCTaalELebrunCDrossaers-BakkerKSmitWSeydelEvan de LaarMCoping with somatic illnesses in online support groups: Do the feared disadvantages actually occur?Computers in Human Behavior2008324230932410.1016/j.chb.2007.01.014FinnJAn exploration of helping processes in an online self-help group focusing on issues of disabilityHealth Soc Work1999082432203110505283ShawBRHawkinsRMcTavishFPingreeSGustafsonDHEffects of insightful disclosure within computer mediated support groups on women with breast cancerHealth Commun20061921334210.1207/s15327027hc1902_516548704StantonALKirkSBCameronCLDanoff-BurgSCoping through emotional approach: scale construction and validationJ Pers Soc Psychol20000678611506910870915CarverCSPozoCHarrisSDNoriegaVScheierMFRobinsonDSKetchamASMoffatFLClarkKCHow coping mediates the effect of optimism on distress: a study of women with early stage breast cancerJ Pers Soc Psychol199308652375908366426WatsonMLawMGSantosMDGreerSBaruchJBlissJThe Mini-MACJournal of Psychosocial Oncology19941031123334610.1300/J077V12N03_03StrongmanKTEmotional creativityInternational review of studies on emotion1991ChichesterWileyFriedmanLNelsonDBaerPLaneMSmithFAdjustment to Breast CancerJournal of Psychosocial Oncology199132184274010.1300/J077v08n04_02Epping-JordanJECompasBEHowellDCPredictors of cancer progression in young adult men and women: avoidance, intrusive thoughts, and psychological symptomsHealth Psychol199411136539477889909StantonALSniderPRCoping with a breast cancer diagnosis: a prospective studyHealth Psychol19930112116238462494ClassenCKoopmanCAngellKSpiegelDCoping styles associated with psychological adjustment to advanced breast cancerHealth Psychol19961115643478973923StantonALDanoff-BurgSCameronCLBishopMCollinsCAKirkSBSworowskiLATwillmanREmotionally expressive coping predicts psychological and physical adjustment to breast cancerJ Consult Clin Psychol2000106858758211068973StantonALDanoff-BurgSHugginsMEThe first year after breast cancer diagnosis: hope and coping strategies as predictors of adjustmentPsychooncology2002112931021192132510.1002/pon.574SpencerSMLehmanJMWyningsCArenaPCarverCSAntoniMHDerhagopianRPIronsonGLoveNConcerns about breast cancer and relations to psychosocial well-being in a multiethnic sample of early-stage patientsHealth Psychol1999031821596810194051BradyMJCellaDFMoFBonomiAETulskyDSLloydSRDeasySCobleighMShiomotoGReliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast quality-of-life instrumentJ Clin Oncol199703153974869060536HannDWinterKJacobsenPMeasurement of depressive symptoms in cancer patients: evaluation of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)J Psychosom Res1999054654374310404478S0022399999000045Dukes HollandKHolahanCKThe relation of social support and coping to positive adaptation to breast cancerPsychology & Health200301181152910.1080/0887044031000080656TalleyAMolixLSchlegelRJBettencourtAThe influence of breast cancer survivors' perceived partner social support and need satisfaction on depressive symptoms: a longitudinal analysisPsychol Health2010042544334910.1080/0887044080258268220397295APA Ethics Committee2010 Amendments to the 2002 "Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct"Am Psychol201065549310.1037/a0020168206423072010-14198-011EU legislation on data protection201310092013-10-09http://ec.europa.eu/justice/data-protection/6KEjYUQEEDutch legislation on data protection201310092013-10-09http://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0011468/geldigheidsdatum_11-07-20136KEjjpGbKvan Uden-KraanCFDrossaertCHTaalESeydelERvan de LaarMAParticipation in online patient support groups endorses patients' empowermentPatient Educ Couns20090174161910.1016/j.pec.2008.07.04418778909S0738-3991(08)00394-7IrwinMArtinKHOxmanMNScreening for depression in the older adult: criterion validity of the 10-item Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)Arch Intern Med1999159151701410448771SpencerSMLehmanJMWyningsCArenaPCarverCSAntoniMHDerhagopianRPIronsonGLoveNConcerns about breast cancer and relations to psychosocial well-being in a multiethnic sample of early-stage patientsHealth Psychol1999031821596810194051BradyMJCellaDFMoFBonomiAETulskyDSLloydSRDeasySCobleighMShiomotoGReliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast quality-of-life instrumentJ Clin Oncol199703153974869060536OldenburgHVrancken PeetersMVan BohemenJHet borstkanker boek2007AmsterdamThoerisAikenLSWestSGMultiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions1991Newbury Park, CASage PublicationsBarakABoniel-NissimMSulerJFostering empowerment in online support groupsComputers in Human Behavior200892451867188310.1016/j.chb.2008.02.004SandaunetAGThe challenge of fitting in: non-participation and withdrawal from an online self-help group for breast cancer patientsSociol Health Illn2008013011314410.1111/j.1467-9566.2007.01041.x18254837SHIL1041HelgesonVSTaylorSESocial comparisons and adjustment among cardiac patientsJournal of Applied Social Psychology19932315117195 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1993.tb01027.xNamkoongKShahDVHanJYKimSCYooWFanDMcTavishFMGustafsonDHExpression and reception of treatment information in breast cancer support groups: how health self-efficacy moderates effects on emotional well-beingPatient Educ Couns20101281 SupplS41710.1016/j.pec.2010.09.00921044825S0738-3991(10)00557-4PMC2993816BanduraASelf-efficacyThe Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology (4th Ed)2010New JerseyJohn Wiley & Sons