Top Articles (Article-Level Metrics)

 
 
Rank Article Tweets Tweets per MonthA
Tweets Influence FactorB
Twimpact Factor (tw7)C Twindex7D
 
1
Mind the Gap: Social Media Engagement by Public Health Researchers
Brett Keller, Alain Labrique, Kriti M Jain, Andrew Pekosz, Orin Levine
J Med Internet Res 2014;16(1):e8
(Jan 14, 2014)
HTML free!
PDF ($22 pay-per-download, free for members [$4.92/mo.]
207 68.27 0.00 84 100
 
 
2
Social Media: A Review and Tutorial of Applications in Medicine and Health Care
Francisco Jose Grajales III, Samuel Sheps, Kendall Ho, Helen Novak-Lauscher, Gunther Eysenbach
J Med Internet Res 2014;16(2):e13
(Feb 11, 2014)
HTML free!
PDF ($22 pay-per-download, free for members [$4.92/mo.]
140 65.76 0.00 104 95
 
 
3
The 1% Rule in Four Digital Health Social Networks: An Observational Study
Trevor van Mierlo
J Med Internet Res 2014;16(2):e33
(Feb 4, 2014)
HTML free!
PDF ($22 pay-per-download, free for members [$4.92/mo.]
139 59.03 0.00 118 100
 
 
4
The Use of Social Networking Sites for Public Health Practice and Research: A Systematic Review
Daniel Capurro, Kate Cole, Maria I. Echavarría, Jonathan Joe, Tina Neogi, Anne M Turner
J Med Internet Res 2014;16(3):e79
(Mar 14, 2014)
HTML free!
PDF ($22 pay-per-download, free for members [$4.92/mo.]
118 104.52 0.00 110 100
 
 
5
Wikis and Collaborative Writing Applications in Health Care: A Scoping Review
Patrick M Archambault, Tom H van de Belt, Francisco J Grajales III, Marjan J Faber, Craig E Kuziemsky, Susie Gagnon, Andrea Bilodeau, Simon Rioux, Willianne LDM Nelen, Marie-Pierre Gagnon, Alexis F Turgeon, Karine Aubin, Irving Gold, Julien Poitras, Gunther Eysenbach, Jan AM Kremer, France Légaré
J Med Internet Res 2013;15(10):e210
(Oct 8, 2013)
HTML free!
PDF ($22 pay-per-download, free for members [$4.92/mo.]
114 19.00 127.00 75 100
 
 
6
A Lot of Action, But Not in the Right Direction: Systematic Review and Content Analysis of Smartphone Applications for the Prevention, Detection, and Management of Cancer
Jacqueline Lorene Bender, Rossini Ying Kwan Yue, Matthew Jason To, Laetitia Deacken, Alejandro R Jadad
J Med Internet Res 2013;15(12):e287
(Dec 23, 2013)
HTML free!
PDF ($22 pay-per-download, free for members [$4.92/mo.]
112 29.93 206.00 38 100
 
 
7
Can Tweets Predict Citations? Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact
Gunther Eysenbach
J Med Internet Res 2011;13(4):e123
(Dec 16, 2011)
HTML free!
PDF ($22 pay-per-download, free for members [$4.92/mo.]
79 13.17 39.00 529 100
 
 
8
Smartphones for Smarter Delivery of Mental Health Programs: A Systematic Review
Tara Donker, Katherine Petrie, Judy Proudfoot, Janine Clarke, Mary-Rose Birch, Helen Christensen
J Med Internet Res 2013;15(11):e247
(Nov 15, 2013)
HTML free!
PDF ($22 pay-per-download, free for members [$4.92/mo.]
69 13.89 70.00 34 95
 
 
9
Enabling Community Through Social Media
Anatoliy Gruzd, Caroline Haythornthwaite
J Med Internet Res 2013;15(10):e248
(Oct 31, 2013)
HTML free!
PDF ($22 pay-per-download, free for members [$4.92/mo.]
69 12.66 189.00 40 95
 
 
10
Use of Sentiment Analysis for Capturing Patient Experience From Free-Text Comments Posted Online
Felix Greaves, Daniel Ramirez-Cano, Christopher Millett, Ara Darzi, Liam Donaldson
J Med Internet Res 2013;15(11):e239
(Nov 1, 2013)
HTML free!
PDF ($22 pay-per-download, free for members [$4.92/mo.]
67 12.36 79.00 64 100
 
 
1 2  3  4  5  6  > >>
 
Total Tweets
 
Tweets per Month
 
Tweets Influence Factor
 
Twimpact Factor (TWIF) tw7
 
Twindex7

A Tweets per month statistic may be artifically inflated for newly published articles

B Tweets Influence Factor (TIF): number of tweets x avg. influence of tweeters (influence is determined by how often all tweets of that person are retweeted by others)

C Twimpact Factor (TWIF) tw7: Number of mentionings in tweets (tweetations) within first 7 days after article publication (Eysenbach 2011)

D Twindex7 (Eysenbach 2011): Rank percentile of this article when its twimpact factor (tw7) is compared to 19 previously published articles. Range 0-100, with higher scores reflecting higher impact on Twitter. Articles with a Twindex greater than 75 have a 75% chance of being highly cited (top quartile by citation), articles with a Twindex less than 75 have a 7% chance to be highly cited.