Top Articles (Article-Level Metrics)

 
 
Rank Article Tweets Tweets per MonthA
Tweets Influence FactorB
Twimpact Factor (tw7)C Twindex7D
 
381
Physician Response Time When Communicating With Patients Over the Internet
Per Egil Kummervold, Jan-Are K Johnsen
J Med Internet Res 2011;13(4):e79
(Nov 1, 2011)
HTML free!
PDF ($22 pay-per-download, free for members [$4.92/mo.]
2 0.17 0.00 27 90
 
 
382
The Role of Engagement in a Tailored Web-Based Smoking Cessation Program: Randomized Controlled Trial
Victor Strecher, Jennifer McClure, Gwen Alexander, Bibhas Chakraborty, Vijay Nair, Janine Konkel, Sarah Greene, Mick Couper, Carola Carlier, Cheryl Wiese, Roderick Little, Cynthia Pomerleau, Ovide Pomerleau
J Med Internet Res 2008;10(5):e36
(Nov 4, 2008)
HTML free!
PDF ($22 pay-per-download, free for members [$4.92/mo.]
2 0.17 0.00 0 0
 
 
383
The Personal Health Record Paradox: Health Care Professionals’ Perspectives and the Information Ecology of Personal Health Record Systems in Organizational and Clinical Settings
Kim M. Nazi
J Med Internet Res 2013;15(4):e70
(Apr 4, 2013)
HTML free!
PDF ($22 pay-per-download, free for members [$4.92/mo.]
2 0.17 0.00 22 80
 
 
384
Consumers' Perceptions of Patient-Accessible Electronic Medical Records
Christina Zarcadoolas, Wendy L Vaughon, Sara J Czaja, Joslyn Levy, Maxine L Rockoff
J Med Internet Res 2013;15(8):e168
(Aug 26, 2013)
HTML free!
PDF ($22 pay-per-download, free for members [$4.92/mo.]
2 0.17 0.00 19 80
 
 
385
The Smartphone in Medicine: A Review of Current and Potential Use Among Physicians and Students
Errol Ozdalga, Ark Ozdalga, Neera Ahuja
J Med Internet Res 2012;14(5):e128
(Sep 27, 2012)
HTML free!
PDF ($22 pay-per-download, free for members [$4.92/mo.]
2 0.17 0.00 132 95
 
 
386
Smartphone Versus Pen-and-Paper Data Collection of Infant Feeding Practices in Rural China
Shuyi Zhang, Qiong Wu, Michelle HMMT van Velthoven, Li Chen, Josip Car, Igor Rudan, Yanfeng Zhang, Ye Li, Robert W Scherpbier
J Med Internet Res 2012;14(5):e119
(Sep 18, 2012)
HTML free!
PDF ($22 pay-per-download, free for members [$4.92/mo.]
2 0.17 0.00 15 60
 
 
387
Social Media and the Empowering of Opponents of Medical Technologies: The Case of Anti-Vaccinationism
Kumanan Wilson, Jennifer Keelan
J Med Internet Res 2013;15(5):e103
(May 28, 2013)
HTML free!
PDF ($22 pay-per-download, free for members [$4.92/mo.]
2 0.17 0.00 20 85
 
 
388
Assessing Adolescent Asthma Symptoms and Adherence Using Mobile Phones
Shelagh A Mulvaney, Yun-Xian Ho, Cather M Cala, Qingxia Chen, Hui Nian, Barron L Patterson, Kevin B Johnson
J Med Internet Res 2013;15(7):e141
(Jul 17, 2013)
HTML free!
PDF ($22 pay-per-download, free for members [$4.92/mo.]
2 0.17 0.00 14 75
 
 
389
Impact of Internet Use on Loneliness and Contact with Others Among Older Adults: Cross-Sectional Analysis
Shelia R. Cotten, William A. Anderson, Brandi M. McCullough
J Med Internet Res 2013;15(2):e39
(Feb 28, 2013)
HTML free!
PDF ($22 pay-per-download, free for members [$4.92/mo.]
2 0.17 0.00 26 90
 
 
390
Design of an mHealth App for the Self-management of Adolescent Type 1 Diabetes: A Pilot Study
Joseph A Cafazzo, Mark Casselman, Nathaniel Hamming, Debra K Katzman, Mark R Palmert
J Med Internet Res 2012;14(3):e70
(May 8, 2012)
HTML free!
PDF ($22 pay-per-download, free for members [$4.92/mo.]
2 0.17 0.00 47 90
 
 
<< < 36  37  38  39 40  41  > >>
 
Total Tweets
 
Tweets per Month
 
Tweets Influence Factor
 
Twimpact Factor (TWIF) tw7
 
Twindex7

A Tweets per month statistic may be artifically inflated for newly published articles

B Tweets Influence Factor (TIF): number of tweets x avg. influence of tweeters (influence is determined by how often all tweets of that person are retweeted by others)

C Twimpact Factor (TWIF) tw7: Number of mentionings in tweets (tweetations) within first 7 days after article publication (Eysenbach 2011)

D Twindex7 (Eysenbach 2011): Rank percentile of this article when its twimpact factor (tw7) is compared to 19 previously published articles. Range 0-100, with higher scores reflecting higher impact on Twitter. Articles with a Twindex greater than 75 have a 75% chance of being highly cited (top quartile by citation), articles with a Twindex less than 75 have a 7% chance to be highly cited.