Top Articles (Article-Level Metrics)

 
 
Rank Article Tweets Tweets per MonthA
Tweets Influence FactorB
Twimpact Factor (tw7)C Twindex7D
 
51
Using Smartphone Technology to Monitor Physical Activity in the 10,000 Steps Program: A Matched Case–Control Trial
Morwenna Kirwan, Mitch J Duncan, Corneel Vandelanotte, W Kerry Mummery
J Med Internet Res 2012;14(2):e55
(Apr 20, 2012)
HTML free!
PDF ($22 pay-per-download, free for members [$4.92/mo.]
2 2.00 0.00 25 85
 
 
52
Consumers' Perceptions of Patient-Accessible Electronic Medical Records
Christina Zarcadoolas, Wendy L Vaughon, Sara J Czaja, Joslyn Levy, Maxine L Rockoff
J Med Internet Res 2013;15(8):e168
(Aug 26, 2013)
HTML free!
PDF ($22 pay-per-download, free for members [$4.92/mo.]
2 2.00 0.00 19 80
 
 
53
Health Care Professionals’ Beliefs About Using Wiki-Based Reminders to Promote Best Practices in Trauma Care
Patrick Michel Archambault, Andrea Bilodeau, Marie-Pierre Gagnon, Karine Aubin, André Lavoie, Jean Lapointe, Julien Poitras, Sylvain Croteau, Martin Pham-Dinh, France Légaré
J Med Internet Res 2012;14(2):e49
(Apr 19, 2012)
HTML free!
PDF ($22 pay-per-download, free for members [$4.92/mo.]
1 1.00 0.00 19 75
 
 
54
A New Dimension of Health Care: Systematic Review of the Uses, Benefits, and Limitations of Social Media for Health Communication
S Anne Moorhead, Diane E. Hazlett, Laura Harrison, Jennifer K Carroll, Anthea Irwin, Ciska Hoving
J Med Internet Res 2013;15(4):e85
(Apr 23, 2013)
HTML free!
PDF ($22 pay-per-download, free for members [$4.92/mo.]
1 1.00 0.00 87 90
 
 
55
Social Media: A Review and Tutorial of Applications in Medicine and Health Care
Francisco Jose Grajales III, Samuel Sheps, Kendall Ho, Helen Novak-Lauscher, Gunther Eysenbach
J Med Internet Res 2014;16(2):e13
(Feb 11, 2014)
HTML free!
PDF ($22 pay-per-download, free for members [$4.92/mo.]
1 1.00 0.00 104 95
 
 
56
Classification Accuracies of Physical Activities Using Smartphone Motion Sensors
Wanmin Wu, Sanjoy Dasgupta, Ernesto E. Ramirez, Carlyn Peterson, Gregory J Norman
J Med Internet Res 2012;14(5):e130
(Oct 5, 2012)
HTML free!
PDF ($22 pay-per-download, free for members [$4.92/mo.]
1 1.00 0.00 18 75
 
 
57
Consensus on Use of the Term “App” Versus “Application” for Reporting of mHealth Research
Thomas Lorchan Lewis, Matthew Alexander Boissaud-Cooke, Timothy Dy Aungst, Gunther Eysenbach
J Med Internet Res 2014;16(7):e174
(Jul 17, 2014)
HTML free!
PDF ($22 pay-per-download, free for members [$4.92/mo.]
1 1.00 0.00 24 90
 
 
58
Collaborative Biomedicine in the Age of Big Data: The Case of Cancer
Abdul R Shaikh, Atul J Butte, Sheri D Schully, William S Dalton, Muin J Khoury, Bradford W Hesse
J Med Internet Res 2014;16(4):e101
(Apr 7, 2014)
HTML free!
PDF ($22 pay-per-download, free for members [$4.92/mo.]
1 1.00 0.00 38 95
 
 
59
The 1% Rule in Four Digital Health Social Networks: An Observational Study
Trevor van Mierlo
J Med Internet Res 2014;16(2):e33
(Feb 4, 2014)
HTML free!
PDF ($22 pay-per-download, free for members [$4.92/mo.]
1 1.00 0.00 118 100
 
 
60
Motives for Participating in a Web-Based Nutrition Cohort According to Sociodemographic, Lifestyle, and Health Characteristics: The NutriNet-Santé Cohort Study
Caroline Méjean, Fabien Szabo de Edelenyi, Mathilde Touvier, Emmanuelle Kesse-Guyot, Chantal Julia, Valentina A Andreeva, Serge Hercberg
J Med Internet Res 2014;16(8):e189
(Aug 7, 2014)
HTML free!
PDF ($22 pay-per-download, free for members [$4.92/mo.]
1 1.00 0.00 4 55
 
 
<< < 3  4  5  6 > >>
 
Total Tweets
 
Tweets per Month
 
Tweets Influence Factor
 
Twimpact Factor (TWIF) tw7
 
Twindex7

A Tweets per month statistic may be artifically inflated for newly published articles

B Tweets Influence Factor (TIF): number of tweets x avg. influence of tweeters (influence is determined by how often all tweets of that person are retweeted by others)

C Twimpact Factor (TWIF) tw7: Number of mentionings in tweets (tweetations) within first 7 days after article publication (Eysenbach 2011)

D Twindex7 (Eysenbach 2011): Rank percentile of this article when its twimpact factor (tw7) is compared to 19 previously published articles. Range 0-100, with higher scores reflecting higher impact on Twitter. Articles with a Twindex greater than 75 have a 75% chance of being highly cited (top quartile by citation), articles with a Twindex less than 75 have a 7% chance to be highly cited.