Top Articles (Article-Level Metrics)

 
 
Rank Article Tweets Tweets per MonthA
Tweets Influence FactorB
Twimpact Factor (tw7)C Twindex7D
 
11
Communicating the Experience of Chronic Pain and Illness Through Blogging
Pamela Katz Ressler, Ylisabyth S. Bradshaw, Lisa Gualtieri, Kenneth Kwan Ho Chui
J Med Internet Res 2012;14(5):e143
(Oct 23, 2012)
HTML free!
PDF ($22 pay-per-download, free for members [$4.92/mo.]
5 5.00 0.00 57 95
 
 
12
A Lot of Action, But Not in the Right Direction: Systematic Review and Content Analysis of Smartphone Applications for the Prevention, Detection, and Management of Cancer
Jacqueline Lorene Bender, Rossini Ying Kwan Yue, Matthew Jason To, Laetitia Deacken, Alejandro R Jadad
J Med Internet Res 2013;15(12):e287
(Dec 23, 2013)
HTML free!
PDF ($22 pay-per-download, free for members [$4.92/mo.]
4 4.00 0.00 38 100
 
 
13
Predictors of eHealth Usage: Insights on The Digital Divide From the Health Information National Trends Survey 2012
Emily Kontos, Kelly D Blake, Wen-Ying Sylvia Chou, Abby Prestin
J Med Internet Res 2014;16(7):e172
(Jul 16, 2014)
HTML free!
PDF ($22 pay-per-download, free for members [$4.92/mo.]
2 2.00 0.00 38 95
 
 
14
Collaborative Biomedicine in the Age of Big Data: The Case of Cancer
Abdul R Shaikh, Atul J Butte, Sheri D Schully, William S Dalton, Muin J Khoury, Bradford W Hesse
J Med Internet Res 2014;16(4):e101
(Apr 7, 2014)
HTML free!
PDF ($22 pay-per-download, free for members [$4.92/mo.]
1 1.00 0.00 38 95
 
 
15
Do Cancer Patients Tweet? Examining the Twitter Use of Cancer Patients in Japan
Atsushi Tsuya, Yuya Sugawara, Atsushi Tanaka, Hiroto Narimatsu
J Med Internet Res 2014;16(5):e137
(May 27, 2014)
HTML free!
PDF ($22 pay-per-download, free for members [$4.92/mo.]
1 1.00 0.00 36 100
 
 
16
Baby Boomers’ Adoption of Consumer Health Technologies: Survey on Readiness and Barriers
Cynthia LeRouge, Craig Van Slyke, Deborah Seale, Kevin Wright
J Med Internet Res 2014;16(9):e200
(Sep 8, 2014)
HTML free!
PDF ($22 pay-per-download, free for members [$4.92/mo.]
33 78.68 0.00 33 100
 
 
17
A Multidimensional View of Personal Health Systems for Underserved Populations
Thomas A Horan, Nathan E Botts, Richard J Burkhard
J Med Internet Res 2010;12(3):e32
(Aug 4, 2010)
HTML free!
PDF ($22 pay-per-download, free for members [$4.92/mo.]
2 2.00 0.00 30 85
 
 
18
Representation of Health Conditions on Facebook: Content Analysis and Evaluation of User Engagement
Timothy M Hale, Akhilesh S Pathipati, Shiyi Zan, Kamal Jethwani
J Med Internet Res 2014;16(8):e182
(Aug 4, 2014)
HTML free!
PDF ($22 pay-per-download, free for members [$4.92/mo.]
11 11.00 0.00 29 95
 
 
19
Are Health Behavior Change Interventions That Use Online Social Networks Effective? A Systematic Review
Carol A Maher, Lucy K Lewis, Katia Ferrar, Simon Marshall, Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij, Corneel Vandelanotte
J Med Internet Res 2014;16(2):e40
(Feb 14, 2014)
HTML free!
PDF ($22 pay-per-download, free for members [$4.92/mo.]
3 3.00 0.00 29 85
 
 
20
A Medical Consultation Service on Facebook: Descriptive Analysis of Questions Answered
Otto Helve
J Med Internet Res 2014;16(9):e202
(Sep 4, 2014)
HTML free!
PDF ($22 pay-per-download, free for members [$4.92/mo.]
29 52.88 0.00 25 100
 
 
<< < 1  2 3  4  5  > >>
 
Total Tweets
 
Tweets per Month
 
Tweets Influence Factor
 
Twimpact Factor (TWIF) tw7
 
Twindex7

A Tweets per month statistic may be artifically inflated for newly published articles

B Tweets Influence Factor (TIF): number of tweets x avg. influence of tweeters (influence is determined by how often all tweets of that person are retweeted by others)

C Twimpact Factor (TWIF) tw7: Number of mentionings in tweets (tweetations) within first 7 days after article publication (Eysenbach 2011)

D Twindex7 (Eysenbach 2011): Rank percentile of this article when its twimpact factor (tw7) is compared to 19 previously published articles. Range 0-100, with higher scores reflecting higher impact on Twitter. Articles with a Twindex greater than 75 have a 75% chance of being highly cited (top quartile by citation), articles with a Twindex less than 75 have a 7% chance to be highly cited.