Top Articles (Article-Level Metrics)

 
 
Rank Article Tweets Tweets per MonthA
 Tweets Influence FactorB
 Twimpact Factor (tw7)C Twindex7D
 
51
Medicine 2.0: Social Networking, Collaboration, Participation, Apomediation, and Openness
Gunther Eysenbach
J Med Internet Res 2008;10(3):e22
(Aug 25, 2008)
HTML free!
PDF ($22 pay-per-download, free for members [$4.92/mo.]
57 1.02 159.00 8 100
 
 
52
Health and Wellness Technology Use by Historically Underserved Health Consumers: Systematic Review
Enid Montague, Jennifer Perchonok
J Med Internet Res 2012;14(3):e78
(May 31, 2012)
HTML free!
PDF ($22 pay-per-download, free for members [$4.92/mo.]
57 4.92 141.00 49 85
 
 
53
De-identification Methods for Open Health Data: The Case of the Heritage Health Prize Claims Dataset
Khaled El Emam, Luk Arbuckle, Gunes Koru, Benjamin Eze, Lisa Gaudette, Emilio Neri, Sean Rose, Jeremy Howard, Jonathan Gluck
J Med Internet Res 2012;14(1):e33
(Feb 27, 2012)
HTML free!
PDF ($22 pay-per-download, free for members [$4.92/mo.]
57 3.90 124.00 24 60
 
 
54
What do Web-Use Skill Differences Imply for Online Health Information Searches?
Markus A Feufel, S Frederica Stahl
J Med Internet Res 2012;14(3):e87
(Jun 13, 2012)
HTML free!
PDF ($22 pay-per-download, free for members [$4.92/mo.]
54 4.84 169.00 31 75
 
 
55
Young Men, Mental Health, and Technology: Implications for Service Design and Delivery in the Digital Age
Louise A Ellis, Philippa Collin, Tracey A Davenport, Patrick J Hurley, Jane M Burns, Ian B Hickie
J Med Internet Res 2012;14(6):e160
(Nov 22, 2012)
HTML free!
PDF ($22 pay-per-download, free for members [$4.92/mo.]
54 9.10 137.00 54 95
 
 
56
The Impact of Electronic Patient Portals on Patient Care: A Systematic Review of Controlled Trials
Elske Ammenwerth, Petra Schnell-Inderst, Alexander Hoerbst
J Med Internet Res 2012;14(6):e162
(Nov 26, 2012)
HTML free!
PDF ($22 pay-per-download, free for members [$4.92/mo.]
53 9.13 134.00 39 90
 
 
57
Online Interventions for Social Marketing Health Behavior Change Campaigns: A Meta-Analysis of Psychological Architectures and Adherence Factors
Brian Cugelman, Mike Thelwall, Phil Dawes
J Med Internet Res 2011;13(1):e17
(Feb 14, 2011)
HTML free!
PDF ($22 pay-per-download, free for members [$4.92/mo.]
52 1.94 115.00 18 65
 
 
58
An Internet-Based Virtual Coach to Promote Physical Activity Adherence in Overweight Adults: Randomized Controlled Trial
Alice Watson, Timothy Bickmore, Abby Cange, Ambar Kulshreshtha, Joseph Kvedar
J Med Internet Res 2012;14(1):e1
(Jan 26, 2012)
HTML free!
PDF ($22 pay-per-download, free for members [$4.92/mo.]
51 3.26 121.00 31 90
 
 
59
Mapping mHealth Research: A Decade of Evolution
Maddalena Fiordelli, Nicola Diviani, Peter J. Schulz
J Med Internet Res 2013;15(5):e95
(May 21, 2013)
HTML free!
PDF ($22 pay-per-download, free for members [$4.92/mo.]
51 395.35 94.00 51 100
 
 
60
"Right Time, Right Place" Health Communication on Twitter: Value and Accuracy of Location Information
Scott H. Burton, Kesler W. Tanner, Christophe G. Giraud-Carrier, Joshua H. West, Michael D. Barnes
J Med Internet Res 2012;14(6):e156
(Nov 15, 2012)
HTML free!
PDF ($22 pay-per-download, free for members [$4.92/mo.]
51 8.28 89.00 32 90
 
 
<< < 3  4  5  6 7  8  > >>
 
Total Tweets
 
Tweets per Month
 
Tweets Influence Factor
 
Twimpact Factor (TWIF) tw7
 
Twindex7

A Tweets per month statistic may be artifically inflated for newly published articles

B Tweets Influence Factor (TIF): number of tweets x avg. influence of tweeters (influence is determined by how often all tweets of that person are retweeted by others)

C Twimpact Factor (TWIF) tw7: Number of mentionings in tweets (tweetations) within first 7 days after article publication (Eysenbach 2011)

D Twindex7 (Eysenbach 2011): Rank percentile of this article when its twimpact factor (tw7) is compared to 19 previously published articles. Range 0-100, with higher scores reflecting higher impact on Twitter. Articles with a Twindex greater than 75 have a 75% chance of being highly cited (top quartile by citation), articles with a Twindex less than 75 have a 7% chance to be highly cited.

 * Tweets Data Collection began January 2008