JMIR is the leading peer-reviewed eHealth/mHealth journal (Impact Factor: 4.7),
ranked #1 in Medical Informatics, and #2 in Health Sciences/Health Services Research - Now publishing daily!
Advertisement: Call for abstracts/speakers & Early Bird Registration now open
Crowdsourcing Knowledge Discovery and Innovations in Medicine
by Leo Anthony Celi, Andrea Ippolito, Robert A Montgomery, Christopher Moses, David J Stone
(Published on 19 Sep 2014)
Clinicians face difficult treatment decisions in contexts that are not well addressed by available evidence as formulated based on research. The digitization of medicine provides an opportunity for clinicians to collaborate with researchers and data scientists on solutions to previously ambiguous and seemingly insolvable questions. But these groups tend to work in isolated environments, and do not communicate or interact effectively. Clinicians are typically buried in the weeds and exigencies of daily practice such that they do not recognize or act on ways to improve knowledge discovery. Researchers may not be able to identify the gaps in clinical knowledge. For data scientists, the main challenge is discerning what is relevant in a domain that is both unfamiliar and complex. Each type...
Internet Search and Krokodil in the Russian Federation: An Infoveillance Study
by Andrey Zheluk, Casey Quinn, Peter Meylakhs
(Published on 18 Sep 2014)
Background: Krokodil is an informal term for a cheap injectable illicit drug domestically prepared from codeine-containing medication (CCM). The method of krokodil preparation may produce desomorphine as well as toxic reactants that cause extensive tissue necrosis. The first confirmed report of krokodil use in Russia took place in 2004. In 2012, reports of krokodil-related injection injuries began to appear beyond Russia in Western Europe and the United States. Objective: This exploratory study had two main objectives: (1) to determine if Internet search patterns could detect regularities in behavioral responses to Russian CCM policy at the population level, and (2) to determine if complementary data sources could explain the regularities we observed. Methods: First, we obtained...
Follow us on Twitter for recent publications and new articles under Open Peer Review
|Number of readers subscribed to email notifications||57358|
|Number of registered authors||32263|
|Number of registered peer-reviewers||10542|
|Number of members||429|
|Submitted manuscripts currently under peer-review||233|
|Current acceptance rate (includes solicited articles)||43%|