JMIR Publications

Journal of Medical Internet Research

Citing this Article

Right click to copy or hit: ctrl+c (cmd+c on mac)

Published on 28.08.13 in Vol 15, No 8 (2013): August

This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Works citing "Physician Choice Making and Characteristics Associated With Using Physician-Rating Websites: Cross-Sectional Study"

According to Crossref, the following articles are citing this article (DOI 10.2196/jmir.2702):

(note that this is only a small subset of citations)

  1. Rothenfluh F, Schulz PJ. Physician Rating Websites: What Aspects Are Important to Identify a Good Doctor, and Are Patients Capable of Assessing Them? A Mixed-Methods Approach Including Physicians’ and Health Care Consumers’ Perspectives. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2017;19(5):e127
    CrossRef
  2. Ricciardi BF, Waddell BS, Nodzo SR, Lange J, Nocon AA, Amundsen S, Tarity TD, McLawhorn AS. Provider-Initiated Patient Satisfaction Reporting Yields Improved Physician Ratings Relative to Online Rating Websites. Orthopedics 2017;
    CrossRef
  3. Emmert M, Sauter L, Jablonski L, Sander U, Taheri-Zadeh F. Do Physicians Respond to Web-Based Patient Ratings? An Analysis of Physicians’ Responses to More Than One Million Web-Based Ratings Over a Six-Year Period. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2017;19(7):e275
    CrossRef
  4. Obele CC, Duszak R, Hawkins CM, Rosenkrantz AB. What Patients Think About Their Interventional Radiologists: Assessment Using a Leading Physician Ratings Website. Journal of the American College of Radiology 2017;14(5):609
    CrossRef
  5. Lu SF, Rui H. Can We Trust Online Physician Ratings? Evidence from Cardiac Surgeons in Florida. Management Science 2017;
    CrossRef
  6. Hao H, Zhang K, Wang W, Gao G. A tale of two countries: International comparison of online doctor reviews between China and the United States. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2017;99:37
    CrossRef
  7. Levin JM, Winkelman RD, Smith GA, Tanenbaum JE, Xiao R, Mroz TE, Steinmetz MP. Emergency department visits after lumbar spine surgery are associated with lower Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems scores. The Spine Journal 2017;
    CrossRef
  8. Emmert M, Wiener M. What factors determine the intention to use hospital report cards? The perspectives of users and non-users. Patient Education and Counseling 2017;100(7):1394
    CrossRef
  9. Hu Y. How does freemium strategy affect the demand of the paid premium mobile healthcare service: from an information asymmetry perspective. Information Development 2017;:026666691772449
    CrossRef
  10. Liang Y, Tukachinsky RH. Narrative Persuasion 2.0: Transportation in Participatory Websites. Communication Research Reports 2017;34(3):201
    CrossRef
  11. Kool RB, Kleefstra SM, Borghans I, Atsma F, van de Belt TH. Influence of Intensified Supervision by Health Care Inspectorates on Online Patient Ratings of Hospitals: A Multilevel Study of More Than 43,000 Online Ratings. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2016;18(7):e198
    CrossRef
  12. Kleefstra SM, Zandbelt LC, Borghans I, de Haes HJ, Kool RB. Investigating the Potential Contribution of Patient Rating Sites to Hospital Supervision: Exploratory Results From an Interview Study in the Netherlands. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2016;18(7):e201
    CrossRef
  13. Samora JB, Lifchez SD, Blazar PE. Physician-Rating Web Sites: Ethical Implications. The Journal of Hand Surgery 2016;41(1):104
    CrossRef
  14. Trehan SK, Daluiski A. Online Patient Ratings: Why They Matter and What They Mean. The Journal of Hand Surgery 2016;41(2):316
    CrossRef
  15. Patel S, Cain R, Neailey K, Hooberman L. Exploring Patients’ Views Toward Giving Web-Based Feedback and Ratings to General Practitioners in England: A Qualitative Descriptive Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2016;18(8):e217
    CrossRef
  16. Smith MA, Bednarz L, Nordby PA, Fink J, Greenlee RT, Bolt D, Magnan EM. Increasing Consumer Engagement by Tailoring a Public Reporting Website on the Quality of Diabetes Care: A Qualitative Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2016;18(12):e332
    CrossRef
  17. Vorhies JS, Weaver MJ, Bishop JA. Admission Through the Emergency Department Is an Independent Risk Factor for Lower Satisfaction With Physician Performance Among Orthopaedic Surgery Patients. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 2016;24(10):735
    CrossRef
  18. Rosenkrantz AB, Won E, Doshi AM. Assessing the Content of YouTube Videos in Educating Patients Regarding Common Imaging Examinations. Journal of the American College of Radiology 2016;13(12):1509
    CrossRef
  19. Trehan SK, DeFrancesco CJ, Nguyen JT, Charalel RA, Daluiski A. Online Patient Ratings of Hand Surgeons. The Journal of Hand Surgery 2016;41(1):98
    CrossRef
  20. Vijayasarathi A, Loehfelm T, Duszak R, Hawkins CM. JOURNAL CLUB: Radiologists' Online Identities: What Patients Find When They Search Radiologists by Name. American Journal of Roentgenology 2016;207(5):952
    CrossRef
  21. Emmert M, Meszmer N, Sander U. Do Health Care Providers Use Online Patient Ratings to Improve the Quality of Care? Results From an Online-Based Cross-Sectional Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2016;18(9):e254
    CrossRef
  22. Gill BC, Zhang JJH, Knoedler MA, Shoskes DA, Vasavada SP. Digital Identity in Academic Urology: Assessment of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, and Opportunity for Improvement. Urology Practice 2016;
    CrossRef
  23. Rothenfluh F, Germeni E, Schulz PJ. Consumer Decision-Making Based on Review Websites: Are There Differences Between Choosing a Hotel and Choosing a Physician?. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2016;18(6):e129
    CrossRef
  24. Rosenkrantz AB, Hughes DR, Duszak R. How Do Publicly Reported Medicare Quality Metrics for Radiologists Compare With Those of Other Specialty Groups?. Journal of the American College of Radiology 2016;13(3):243
    CrossRef
  25. Huis in ’t Veld EA, Canales FL, Furnas HJ. The Impact of a Plastic Surgeon’s Gender on Patient Choice. Aesthetic Surgery Journal 2016;:sjw180
    CrossRef
  26. Wong-Rieger D. Not Surprising: Patients Not Engaged and Not Using Public Healthcare Quality Information. The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research 2016;9(3):191
    CrossRef
  27. Burkle CM, Keegan MT. Popularity of internet physician rating sites and their apparent influence on patients’ choices of physicians. BMC Health Services Research 2015;15(1)
    CrossRef
  28. Bardach NS, Hibbard JH, Greaves F, Dudley RA. Sources of Traffic and Visitors’ Preferences Regarding Online Public Reports of Quality: Web Analytics and Online Survey Results. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2015;17(5):e102
    CrossRef
  29. Hesse T. Arztbewertungsportale im Internet. Journal für Ästhetische Chirurgie 2015;8(2):84
    CrossRef
  30. Emmert M, Adelhardt T, Sander U, Wambach V, Lindenthal J. A cross-sectional study assessing the association between online ratings and structural and quality of care measures: results from two German physician rating websites. BMC Health Services Research 2015;15(1)
    CrossRef
  31. Pelliccia F, Coats AJ, Pani L, Gaudio C, Rosano G. Transparency in medical research: Time for a paradigm shift. International Journal of Cardiology 2015;186:259
    CrossRef
  32. Bäumer FS, Dollmann M, Geierhos M. Find a Physician by Matching Medical Needs Described in your Own Words. Procedia Computer Science 2015;63:417
    CrossRef
  33. Hao H. The Development of Online Doctor Reviews in China: An Analysis of the Largest Online Doctor Review Website in China. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2015;17(6):e134
    CrossRef
  34. Gilbert K, Hawkins CM, Hughes DR, Patel K, Gogia N, Sekhar A, Duszak R. Physician Rating Websites: Do Radiologists Have an Online Presence?. Journal of the American College of Radiology 2015;12(8):867
    CrossRef
  35. Patel S, Cain R, Neailey K, Hooberman L. General Practitioners’ Concerns About Online Patient Feedback: Findings From a Descriptive Exploratory Qualitative Study in England. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2015;17(12):e276
    CrossRef
  36. Baum N. Online Reputation Management for Urologists. Urology Practice 2015;2(2):69
    CrossRef
  37. Grabner-Kräuter S, Waiguny MK. Insights Into the Impact of Online Physician Reviews on Patients’ Decision Making: Randomized Experiment. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2015;17(4):e93
    CrossRef
  38. Pelliccia F, Coats AJ, Pani L, Gaudio C, Rosano G. Transparency in medical research: Time for a paradigm shift. Clinical Trials and Regulatory Science in Cardiology 2015;2-3:1
    CrossRef
  39. Atkinson S. Current status of online rating of Australian doctors. Australian Journal of Primary Health 2014;20(3):222
    CrossRef
  40. Romppel M, Grande G. Qualität der Gesundheitsversorgung – Was wollen Patienten wissen?. Public Health Forum 2014;22(2)
    CrossRef
  41. Emmert M, Meier F, Heider A, Dürr C, Sander U. What do patients say about their physicians? An analysis of 3000 narrative comments posted on a German physician rating website. Health Policy 2014;118(1):66
    CrossRef
  42. Bidmon S, Terlutter R, Röttl J. What Explains Usage of Mobile Physician-Rating Apps? Results From a Web-Based Questionnaire. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2014;16(6):e148
    CrossRef
  43. Terlutter R, Bidmon S, Röttl J. Who Uses Physician-Rating Websites? Differences in Sociodemographic Variables, Psychographic Variables, and Health Status of Users and Nonusers of Physician-Rating Websites. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2014;16(3):e97
    CrossRef
  44. Curtin C. Preface. Hand Clinics 2014;30(1):ix
    CrossRef
  45. Verhoef LM, Van de Belt TH, Engelen LJ, Schoonhoven L, Kool RB. Social Media and Rating Sites as Tools to Understanding Quality of Care: A Scoping Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2014;16(2):e56
    CrossRef

According to Crossref, the following books are citing this article (DOI 10.2196/jmir.2702)

:
  1. Geierhos M, Bäumer FS, Schulze S, Klotz C. Modeling and Using Context. 2015. Chapter 12:159
    CrossRef