JMIR Publications

Select Journals for Content Updates

When finished, please click submit.

This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

    Original Paper

    An Online Resource of Digital Stories About Cancer Genetics: Qualitative Study of Patient Preferences and Information Needs

    Institute of Medical Genetics, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom

    Corresponding Author:

    Rachel Iredale, BSocSc, MA, PhD

    Institute of Medical Genetics

    Cardiff University

    Heath Park

    Cardiff, CF14 4XN

    United Kingdom

    Phone: 44 (0)2920 748925

    Fax:44 (0)2920 743846

    Email:


    ABSTRACT

    Background: The Cancer Genetics Service for Wales (CGSW) was established in 1998 as an all-Wales service for individuals with concerns about their family history of cancer. CGSW offers a range of services such as risk assessment, genetic counseling, and genetic testing. Individuals referred to cancer genetics services often have unmet information and support needs, and they value access to practical and experiential information from other patients and health professionals. As a result of the lifelong nature of genetic conditions, a fundamental challenge is to meet the ongoing needs of these patients by providing easily accessible and reliable information.

    Objectives: Our aims were to explore how the long-term information and support needs of CGSW patients could be met and to assess whether an online bank of digital stories about cancer genetics would be acceptable to patients.

    Methods: In 2009, CGSW organized patient panels across Wales. During these events, 169 patients were asked for their feedback about a potential online resource of digital stories from CGSW patients and staff. A total of 75 patients registered to take part in the project and 23 people from across Wales agreed to share their story. All participants took part in a follow-up interview.

    Results: Patient preferences for an online collection of cancer genetics stories were collected at the patient panels. Key topics to be covered by the stories were identified, and this feedback informed the development of the website to ensure that patients’ needs would be met. The 23 patient storytellers were aged between 28 and 75 years, and 19 were female. The digital stories reflect patients’ experiences within CGSW and the implications of living with or at risk of cancer. Follow-up interviews with patient storytellers showed that they shared their experiences as a means of helping other patients and to increase understanding of the cancer genetics service. Digital stories were also collected from 12 members of staff working at CGSW. The digital stories provide reliable and easily accessible information about cancer genetics and are hosted on the StoryBank website (www.cancergeneticsstorybank.co.uk).

    Conclusions: The Internet is one mechanism through which the long-term information and support needs of cancer genetics patients can be met. The StoryBank is one of the first places where patient and staff stories have been allied to every aspect of a patient pathway through a service and provides patients with an experiential perspective of the cancer genetics “journey.” The StoryBank was developed in direct response to patient feedback and is an innovative example of patient involvement in service development. The stories are a useful resource for newly referred patients, current patients, the general public, and health care professionals.

    J Med Internet Res 2011;13(3):e78)

    doi:10.2196/jmir.1735

    KEYWORDS



    Introduction

    Health Information on the Internet

    Internet use is growing rapidly throughout the world and individuals are increasingly turning to the Internet as a source of health information [1]. Indeed, health websites are some of the most viewed sites on the Internet [2]. In the United Kingdom, the National Health Service (NHS) Cancer Plan advises that the Internet should be promoted as a source of information for cancer patients [3]. It has been shown that people with cancer use the Internet for a wide range of information and support needs, throughout their illness [4,5]. For example, cancer patients use the Internet to interpret symptoms; to help understand consultations; to find out about tests and treatments; as a source of support; and to hear about the experiences of other patients [5-7]. Research suggests that many patients who use the Internet are satisfied with the information they receive and that their subsequent health care decisions are influenced by the information they gain [8,9].

    Despite concerns about the accuracy of health information on the Internet [1,5,10], studies have shown that when searching the Internet, people assess the credibility of a website in several ways [10-12]. For example, participants in out study looked for the source of the website and prefer noncommercial sites, which are attached to recognized centers of excellence, such as universities or well-known health centers [12]. Overall, research suggests that the Internet is a useful resource for health information and individuals continue to use the Web to find this information. Research also shows that individuals want to hear from other people who have been through similar situations [13]. This is reflected in the increasing use of online communities and social networking sites for health purposes. Bender and colleagues identified a total of 1,090,397 Facebook users who were members of 620 breast cancer groups [14]. Cancer patients also benefit from having access to online stories from other patients, especially when the stories cover their specific information needs [15].

    The Role of Stories

    Health practitioners have traditionally used didactic approaches when giving information to patients. However, there is growing recognition that using stories to transmit health information may have many benefits. Narratives have been shown to improve the processing of information by capturing attention, enhancing understanding, and facilitating recall [16]. People with serious illnesses welcome the opportunity to hear from others who have had a similar experience [12,13]. One study showed that patients valued being able to access the experiences of other patients because it gave them reassurance and provided practical information that health professionals may not have perceived to be relevant [12]. Patients reported that hearing the experiences of others who had been through a similar situation would have reduced feelings of fear and isolation during their illness [12]. Stories have also been shown to be useful when presenting information to certain population groups [16,17]. For example, African American women from low-income neighborhoods who watched a video narrative from another patient describing a mammogram showed greater confidence with the procedure and had more conversations about breast cancer with family members than did women who watched a content-equivalent informational video [16].

    The Cancer Genetics Service for Wales

    The population of the United Kingdom is approximately 61 million, of whom 3 million live in Wales (area approximately 8000 square miles). A majority of the Welsh population reside in South Wales (see Figure 1) [18]. The Cancer Genetics Service for Wales (CGSW) was established in 1998 for individuals with concerns about their family history of cancer. It is an all-Wales service with three sites across the country in South East Wales, South West Wales, and North Wales. To date over 26,000 people have been referred to the service. To process referrals, CGSW uses a triage system [19]. First, patients are required to complete and return a detailed family history questionnaire. This information is then used to make a cancer genetic risk assessment, with an individual classified as having an average, moderate, or high risk of inheriting cancer. Patients found to be at moderate or high risk may be offered genetic counseling, screening, and if appropriate, genetic testing. Individuals categorized as being at average risk are advised that their risk is the same as that of the general population, and in most cases they are not offered a clinic appointment. Approximately 30% of all patients referred to CGSW are classified as being at high risk [20]. Unlike at many other health care services, once a person is referred to CGSW they can remain with the service for life because of the lifelong nature of genetic conditions. In the field of genetics, most information is based on probability and uncertainty and, as a result, living with the risk of inheriting cancer is a complex experience that can affect cognitive, emotional, and social functioning [21]. Several studies have shown that individuals undergoing genetic risk assessments show increased levels of psychological distress [22,23].

    Figure 1. Population density map of Wales.
    View this figure

    Identifying the Need for the Cancer Genetics StoryBank

    It should be recognized that the information needs of cancer genetics patients are diverse and can change over time [24-27]. Individuals referred to CGSW often have not been affected with cancer themselves but have a history of cancer in their families. For these people, unlike those who have a cancer diagnosis, their status is ambiguous because they maybe at increased risk of cancer but they do not have that illness now [28]. Furthermore, these individuals may have children who might also be at increased risk of hereditary cancer. The combination of these factors can make it difficult for families involved with cancer genetics services to make sense of their situation. It is imperative to meet patients’ varying information needs because improved patient understanding may increase uptake of recommended screening and preventive measures, as well as help an individual cope with the risk assessment process, their risk categorization, and living with the risk of cancer [29,30].

    Previous studies have found that the information needs of many patients living with a genetic risk of cancer are not being met [20,24,29] and that individuals undergoing genetic risk assessments have poor knowledge of genetics and the processes involved [30-33]. Many resources offer Web-based support to individuals with cancer, including online communities on UK cancer charity websites such as Macmillan and Breast Cancer Care. However, there are limited resources for individuals living at risk of cancer. One study examining the needs of patients referred to CGSW found that patients wanted improved access to information [20]. For example, patients sought general information about services, new developments in genetics, and details of other charities and organizations that could provide more information. Patients also wanted specific information, such as descriptions of a clinic consultation and the procedures involved in a DNA test. Patients suggested this information could be provided on a public website [20]. Another study exploring the information needs of women carrying a BRCA1/2 gene mutation, which increases their risk of breast and ovarian cancer, found that participants felt that they and their families would benefit from an ongoing support network, which incorporated some Internet-based support [34]. Previous research with CGSW patients has shown that patients want up-to-date and accurate information about cancer genetics, to be reminded that they are never discharged from the service, and the opportunity to hear from other patients [20,35]. The StoryBank was therefore developed within CGSW in response to patient feedback, to address the demand for a Web-based resource for cancer genetics patients, which would meet their information and support needs on a long-term basis.

    Involving Patients in Service Development

    Patient involvement in health service development is imperative because in most Western countries there is increasing recognition that involving patients in health care is important for improving the quality of care provided [36,37]. In England and Wales health policies over the last 10 years have aimed to increase patient involvement in the NHS [38,39]. In relation to cancer, the Calman-Hine report and the NHS Cancer Plan have long emphasized that cancer services should be more patient centered and should be developed with consideration of patient views [3,40].

    This paper describes how patients were involved in the development of the StoryBank [41], a website hosting a collection of digital stories from CGSW patients and staff about the cancer genetics service and associated clinical and psychosocial issues. Digital stories are the fusion of a narrative, in which the individual tells his or her story, with a series of images to illustrate the story. The aim of the StoryBank is to provide information and support to current and future patients, in a form that is easily accessible, reliable, engaging, and perhaps most important, allows patients to hear about the experiences of other patients. Patients have been involved at every stage of the project, from the initial conception to the launch of the website.


    Methods

    Patient Panels

    The StoryBank has evolved as part of a 5-year program of work focusing on increasing patient involvement in service improvement and delivery at CGSW [35]. In June 2009, a newsletter was issued inviting CGSW patients to attend a patient panel. The newsletter was sent to 5906 patients, who had expressly asked to be kept informed about new initiatives. Of these patients, 28.46% (1681/5906 patients) returned the invitation, with 25.3% (425/1681 patients) expressing an interest in attending a patient panel. In total three patient panels were held across Wales during autumn 2009, with 169 participants attending (South East Wales n = 83; South West Wales n = 43; North Wales n = 43). The aims of the patient panels were for patients to decide which issues should be covered by the stories and how the Web-based resource should be developed. At the patient panels, patients were shown examples of digital stories. In groups of 8–10, patients were asked to discuss how digital stories could best meet CGSW patients’ information and support needs and their preferences regarding how they would like to tell their stories. Each group was given a feedback sheet to record their comments. All the feedback sheets were collected at the end of each patient panel. We collected 359 comments, 111 of which were excluded as they related to comments about the digital stories that were shown or about the patient panel itself. Therefore, we analyzed the content of 248 comments about patient preferences for the StoryBank [42]. After detailed review of the data, two authors (RI and JH) developed the standardized coding categories. RI and JH then independently coded the comments, with any discrepancies resolved through discussion. Patient preferences for the digital stories were examined by calculating simple frequencies on all coding categories. Information obtained during this task was used to plan the StoryBank project, and patients were also invited to register to share their own cancer genetics story.

    Participants

    In total, 75 patients at the patient panels said they would like to take part in the StoryBank. In spring 2010, further information about the project and a consent form were sent to these patients. Patients were asked to return the consent form to confirm they wanted to share their story and were happy to be contacted. From across Wales, 24 patients returned a consent form, although one individual did not progress past the phone call stage. The 23 patients who shared their story ranged in age from 28 to 75 years and 19 were female; 12 (52%) were classified as being at high risk, 6 (26%) as moderate risk, and 3 (13%) as average risk; 2 (9%) were relatives of patients who had been referred to the service.

    Procedure

    Once a consent form had been received, each participant was contacted by telephone to arrange a convenient date and location to record their story. The majority of participants (20/23, 87%) chose to record their story at home.

    During the appointments, which took the form of an unstructured interview, participants were asked to describe their experience of the cancer genetics service. The researchers’ role was simply to facilitate the telling of the story and to ask patients for more information when clarification was needed. All recordings were made using a high-quality audio recorder. The audio recordings lasted between 17 and 60 minutes. Participants were asked to provide photographs to illustrate their story, if they desired. Only one patient did not want to use personal photographs and another patient wished to remain anonymous and so provided photographs that did not include family members or friends.

    Stories were also collected from 12 members of staff working in, or with, CGSW. Staff included specialists in clinical genetics, a family history coordinator, and a clinical scientist at the All Wales Molecular Genetics Laboratory. Staff provided factual stories about cancer, genetics, CGSW, and the processes involved. Recordings of staff stories lasted between 10 and 45 minutes.

    All interviews were transcribed verbatim. Both patient and staff stories were edited to short clips, between 40 and 300 seconds in duration. More than 1 story was edited for 12 of the storytellers. All stories were seen and verified by every storyteller before being uploaded onto the website. The 53 stories from patients and staff are hosted on Vimeo (Vimeo, LLC, New York, NY, USA), a video hosting website, and the stories are embedded within the StoryBank website [41].

    Evaluation

    The StoryBank was evaluated on two levels: first, a brief telephone follow-up interview was conducted with all 23 patient storytellers approximately 2 weeks after the storytelling appointment, to explore their reasons for taking part in the StoryBank and their experiences of telling their story. All interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. The content of the follow-up interview was analyzed to summarize patients’ evaluation of sharing their story and their views about the StoryBank [42]. Each transcript was read carefully and all relevant text was highlighted. All highlighted text from three to four transcripts was used to develop preliminary categories. The remaining transcripts were coded using these categories and by adding new categories where data did not fit into an existing category [43]. The data in all the categories were then examined independently by two authors (RI and JH), which led to some categories being combined. This resulted in three main categories of storytellers’ reasons for contributing to the StoryBank and how they hoped their stories would benefit website users. For the second level of evaluation, a brief online survey was incorporated into the website to capture data about who was using the website and to give users the opportunity to leave feedback about the site. As this evaluation is ongoing, data from the online survey will be presented elsewhere.


    Results

    Patient Preferences for the StoryBank

    At the patient panels, patients suggested topics that should be included in the StoryBank. These included tracing family histories; living with the risk of cancer; and telling family members, such as children, about their risk of inherited cancer. On the feedback forms, patients commented that the stories should convey personal experiences and practical information about the service and cancer genetics. Patients also expressed a preference for the StoryBank to include stories about a range of cancers and different levels of risk. Patient comments about the StoryBank and how they were used to inform the development of the website are shown in Table 1. Feedback about the project at the patient panels was generally positive with comments such as “I would have liked to have seen a digital story when I was going through the journey, for a better understanding” and “a great idea and a valuable service”.

    Table 1. Patient preferences for the StoryBank (N = 248) and how they have been considered during website development
    View this table

    Developing the Website

    A total of 53 individual stories about the various aspects of the cancer genetics service were produced. Of these, 37 clips are from patients about their personal experiences and 16 clips are from staff providing more practical information about the service (see Multimedia Appendix 1). The content of the StoryBank was developed using the information provided directly from service users at the patient panels. First, the routine patient journey through CGSW was identified and divided into key topics. These topics were as follows:

    • What is the Cancer Genetics Service for Wales?
    • Completing the family history questionnaire
    • Waiting for the results of a risk assessment
    • Being told if you are at low, moderate, or high risk of cancer
    • Attending genetic counseling
    • Having a genetic test
    • Making decisions about screening and surgery
    • Living with cancer
    • Information about rare cancers
    • Sources of support.

    Next, the main themes of each patient and staff story were identified and mapped onto the key topics. The stories are presented on the website under these key topics (see Figure 2). However, there is also a page on the site that lists all the storytellers and their stories, so that users can also search for stories via the storyteller in order to see the journey one particular person might have gone through [41]. All the stories were transcribed and the transcripts are available to download from the website as PDF files (see Figure 3 and Multimedia Appendix 2).

    The website was designed with the aid of a professional Web designer, and patients and staff at CGSW were invited to give their feedback about the website before it was launched. A special event was held to mark the launch of the website on November 25, 2010. The event was opened by the First Minister of Wales, Rt Hon Carwyn Jones AM, and was attended by 105 guests, including the storytellers and their families; staff at CGSW; and others interested in cancer, genetics, and promoting patient-centered service delivery across NHS Wales. In the first month (November 25, 2010 to December 25, 2010) since the website was launched, the stories were viewed 494 times and were played in 15 countries across the world, including the USA, Australia, South Korea, the Netherlands, and Spain.

    Figure 2. Screenshot from the StoryBank (www.cancergeneticsstorybank.co.uk).
    View this figure
    Figure 3. Screenshot of PDF story transcript from the StoryBank (www.cancergeneticsstorybank.co.uk).
    View this figure

    Evaluation

    Data from the follow-up interviews demonstrate that the storytellers were all positive about the StoryBank and the experience of sharing their story. Table 2 shows the three coding categories that were developed from the content analysis of the interview transcripts. A majority of the storytellers (19/23, 83%) stated that they wanted to share their story as a means of helping others who were going through a similar experience. For example, one patient said

    I’d done a lot of Internet searching and I couldn’t find a story similar to mine. So I thought if I get an opportunity to say my story then I will,because at some point there will be somebody going through the same thing as me.

    Another patient explained

    I’ve got first hand experience of what it’s like and hopefully somebody else can experience positive feelings from what I’ve said
    Table 2. Storytellers’ reflections on sharing their story (N = 23)
    View this table

    Discussion

    During 3 years of patient-centered research at CGSW we found that patients want access to factual information about cancer genetic services and to hear personal stories from a variety of patients who are similar to themselves in terms of cancer genetic risk level, age, and gender [20,35]. Patients were invited to attend a patient panel to suggest topics to be included in the StoryBank, a Web-based resource of digital stories from patients and staff at CGSW. These suggestions were used to ensure that the StoryBank met the information and support needs of current and future patients and that it was developed in accordance with patient preferences. Increasing patient involvement in service development is vital because it leads to improved communication and decision making, and ultimately to better health outcomes [37]. We suggest that the StoryBank project is an innovative example of involving patients in service development and delivery.

    The success of websites such as healthtalkonline (formerly DIPEx) [13,44] and the use of patient stories on UK cancer charity websites such as Breast Cancer Care and Macmillan demonstrates that patients want, and indeed use, the opportunity to listen to individuals who have had similar experiences. Incorporating stories from CGSW patients with information from staff members, and mapping these onto every key stage of the cancer genetics journey, allows us to provide information in a form that is reliable, accessible, and engaging. Providing patients with the information they require allows individuals to have a better understanding of the risk assessment and associated processes [31]. This in turn results in several benefits such as more realistic patient expectations, and ultimately helps individuals cope with their risk assessment and risk categorization [29,30]. The StoryBank is one of the first places where patient stories have been aligned with the patient pathway through a health service. By providing narrative accounts from patients who have already been referred to CGSW, about how they have coped with the emotional challenges they faced, we hope that future patients will gain encouragement and support as they progress on their own journey through the service.

    The StoryBank also informs patients about the psychosocial aspects of genetic testing and where to access additional information and support, which are often omitted from standard information leaflets provided in genetics clinics [45]. Presenting health information in a digital format can also be beneficial for patients with low literacy levels [46], and the availability of cancer genetic information before counseling may help patients with lower literacy to prepare for their clinic appointment [47]. Patient narratives have also been shown to improve understanding and aid recall of health-related information [16,36]. The data from the follow-up telephone interviews also show that participants wanted to share their story to increase other patients’ understanding of the services provided by CGSW and to convey information about what to expect from genetic risk assessment, genetic counseling, and genetic testing.

    By hosting patient and staff digital stories on a website, the StoryBank allows individuals to access information about CGSW and hear from other patients 24 hours a day, from anywhere in the world. This is particularly beneficial for CGSW, which, as an all-Wales service, receives referrals from patients across the country. Many people in Wales live in rural communities with poor transport links [48,49]. Thus, one of the challenges faced by CGSW was meeting the information and support needs of all its patients, while recognizing the geographical constraints of Wales. The StoryBank provides a solution to meeting these patient needs.

    The challenge for the future is to ensure that health professionals are aware of the website and the information it provides. As individuals continue to turn to the Internet for health information, it is vital that health professionals are familiar with the information that is available and are able to direct patients to the relevant resources [50]. Staff at CGSW have been involved with the project from the patient panels to the development and launch of the website. Furthermore, all staff members with patient contact at CGSW have been asked to include the StoryBank website address on correspondence with patients. Our task is to continue to increase awareness of the website both within CGSW and more widely. For example, general practitioners are one of the main routes through which patients are referred to CGSW [19]. Thus, it is important that they understand the service provided and the area of cancer genetics more generally.

    Conclusions

    In conclusion, the StoryBank was developed in response to patient feedback to meet the long-term information and support needs of cancer genetics patients. The StoryBank provides a Web-based resource of reliable, accessible, and engaging information for current and future cancer genetics patients. The patients’ stories communicate an experiential perspective of the cancer genetics service. The StoryBank is one of the first places where patient and staff stories have been mapped onto each stage of a service, which will help people gain a sense of the journey they too may experience. We suggest that the StoryBank could also be useful in raising awareness of cancer genetics and CGSW among health care professionals. The StoryBank is an innovative online resource, developed in collaboration with current patients, which could be applied to other genetic or other long-term chronic health conditions, such as diabetes and asthma, in the NHS and elsewhere.

    Acknowledgments

    We thank all the storytellers for contributing their stories to the StoryBank. The authors would like to thank Julie Hayward, Alex Murray, Rose Thompson and StoryWorks for their help with the StoryBank project. The work was funded by Tenovus, the Cancer Charity in Wales. The funders had no involvement in the research design or conduct or in the interpretation of results.

    Conflicts of Interest

    None declared

    Multimedia Appendix 1

    Digital story (video) from the StoryBank website about the Cancer Genetics Service for Wales.

    MP4 File (MP4 Video), 84MB

    Multimedia Appendix 2

    PDF transcript of the digital story about the Cancer Genetics Service for Wales.

    PDF File (Adobe PDF File), 115KB

    References

    1. Bernhardt JM, Lariscy RA, Parrott RL, Silk KJ, Felter EM. Perceived barriers to Internet-based health communication on human genetics. J Health Commun 2002;7(4):325-340. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    2. Eaton L. Europeans and Americans turn to internet for health information. BMJ 2002;325(7371):989.
    3. UK Department of Health. 2000 Sep. The NHS Cancer Plan: A Plan for Investment, a Plan for Reform   URL: http:/​/www.​dh.gov.uk/​prod_consum_dh/​groups/​dh_digitalassets/​@dh/​@en/​documents/​digitalasset/​dh_4014513.​pdf [accessed 2011-06-15] [WebCite Cache]
    4. Satterlund MJ, McCaul KD, Sandgren AK. Information gathering over time by breast cancer patients. J Med Internet Res 2003;5(3):e15 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    5. Ziebland S. The importance of being expert: the quest for cancer information on the Internet. Soc Sci Med 2004 Nov;59(9):1783-1793. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    6. Fogel J, Albert SM, Schnabel F, Ditkoff BA, Neugut AI. Use of the Internet by women with breast cancer. J Med Internet Res 2002;4(2):E9 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    7. Fogel J, Albert SM, Schnabel F, Ditkoff BA, Neugut AI. Internet use and social support in women with breast cancer. Health Psychol 2002 Jul;21(4):398-404. [Medline]
    8. Eysenbach G. The impact of the Internet on cancer outcomes. CA Cancer J Clin 2003;53(6):356-371. [Medline]
    9. Raupach JC, Hiller JE. Information and support for women following the primary treatment of breast cancer. Health Expect 2002 Dec;5(4):289-301. [Medline]
    10. Eysenbach G, Köhler C. How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the world wide web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and in-depth interviews. BMJ 2002 Mar 9;324(7337):573-577 [FREE Full text] [Medline]
    11. Eysenbach G, Powell J, Kuss O, Sa ER. Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the world wide web: a systematic review. JAMA 2002;287(20):2691-2700 [FREE Full text] [Medline]
    12. Rozmovits L, Ziebland S. What do patients with prostate or breast cancer want from an Internet site? A qualitative study of information needs. Patient Educ Couns 2004 Apr;53(1):57-64. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    13. Herxheimer A, McPherson A, Miller R, Shepperd S, Yaphe J, Ziebland S. Database of patients' experiences (DIPEx): a multi-media approach to sharing experiences and information. Lancet 2000 Apr 29;355(9214):1540-1543. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    14. Bender JL, Jimenez-Marroquin MC, Jadad AR. Seeking support on Facebook: a content analysis of breast cancer groups. J Med Internet Res 2011;13(1):e16 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    15. Overberg R, Otten W, de Man A, Toussaint P, Westenbrink J, Zwetsloot-Schonk B. How breast cancer patients want to search for and retrieve information from stories of other patients on the internet: an online randomized controlled experiment. J Med Internet Res 2010;12(1):e7 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    16. Kreuter MW, Holmes K, Alcaraz K, Kalesan B, Rath S, Richert M, et al. Comparing narrative and informational videos to increase mammography in low-income African American women. Patient Educ Couns 2010 Dec;81 Suppl:S6-14. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    17. McQueen A, Kreuter MW. Women's cognitive and affective reactions to breast cancer survivor stories: a structural equation analysis. Patient Educ Couns 2010 Dec;81 Suppl:S15-S21. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    18. UK Office for National Statistics. 2011 Jun 15. Wales Population Density: By Local or Unitary Authority, 2009   URL: http://www.statistics.gov.uk/cci/nugget.asp?id=1081 [accessed 2011-06-15] [WebCite Cache]
    19. Elwyn G, Iredale R, Gray J. Reactions of GPs to a triage-controlled referral system for cancer genetics. Fam Pract 2002 Feb;19(1):65-71 [FREE Full text] [Medline]
    20. Iredale R, Brain K, Gray J, France E. The information and support needs of women at high risk of familial breast and ovarian cancer: how can cancer genetic services give patients what they want? Fam Cancer 2003;2(2):119-121. [Medline]
    21. Emery J. Is informed choice in genetic testing a different breed of informed decision-making? A discussion paper. Health Expect 2001 Jun;4(2):81-86. [Medline]
    22. Bennett P, Wilkinson C, Turner J, Edwards RT, France B, Griffith G, et al. Factors associated with intrusive cancer-related worries in women undergoing cancer genetic risk assessment. Fam Cancer 2009;8(2):159-165. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    23. Brain K, Norman P, Gray J, Rogers C, Mansel R, Harper P. A randomized trial of specialist genetic assessment: psychological impact on women at different levels of familial breast cancer risk. Br J Cancer 2002 Jan 21;86(2):233-238 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    24. Metcalfe KA, Liede A, Hoodfar E, Scott A, Foulkes WD, Narod SA. An evaluation of needs of female BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers undergoing genetic counselling. J Med Genet 2000 Nov;37(11):866-874 [FREE Full text] [Medline]
    25. Brain K, Gray J, Norman P, Parsons E, Clarke A, Rogers C, et al. Why do women attend familial breast cancer clinics? J Med Genet 2000 Mar;37(3):197-202 [FREE Full text] [Medline]
    26. Halbert Ch, Kessler L, Collier A, Paul Wileyto E, Brewster K, Weathers B. Psychological functioning in African American women at an increased risk of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. Clin Genet 2005 Sep;68(3):222-227. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    27. Hawkins RP, Pingree S, Shaw B, Serlin RC, Swoboda C, Han JY, et al. Mediating processes of two communication interventions for breast cancer patients. Patient Educ Couns 2010 Dec;81 Suppl:S48-S53. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    28. Scott S, Prior L, Wood F, Gray J. Repositioning the patient: the implications of being 'at risk'. Soc Sci Med 2005 Apr;60(8):1869-1879. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    29. Metcalfe A, Werrett J, Burgess L, Chapman C, Clifford C. Cancer genetic predisposition: information needs of patients irrespective of risk level. Fam Cancer 2009;8(4):403-412. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    30. Phelps C, Wood F, Bennett P, Brain K, Gray J. Knowledge and expectations of women undergoing cancer genetic risk assessment: a qualitative analysis of free-text questionnaire comments. J Genet Couns 2007 Aug;16(4):505-514. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    31. Hallowell N, Murton F, Statham H, Green JM, Richards MP. Women's need for information before attending genetic counselling for familial breast or ovarian cancer: a questionnaire, interview, and observational study. BMJ 1997 Jan 25;314(7076):281-283 [FREE Full text] [Medline]
    32. Henderson BJ, Maguire BT. Lay representations of genetic disease and predictive testing. J Health Psychol 1998;3:233-241. [CrossRef]
    33. Pieterse AH, Ausems MG, Van Dulmen AM, Beemer FA, Bensing JM. Initial cancer genetic counseling consultation: change in counselees' cognitions and anxiety, and association with addressing their needs and preferences. Am J Med Genet A 2005 Aug 15;137(1):27-35. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    34. Hughes L, Phelps C. "The bigger the network the bigger the bowl of cherries...": exploring the acceptability of, and preferences for, an ongoing support network for known BRCA 1 and BRCA 2 mutation carriers. J Genet Couns 2010 Oct;19(5):487-496. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    35. Iredale R, Mundy L, Marsden D, Murray A. Patient involvement at the Cancer Genetics Service for Wales: meeting the long-term information and support needs of people at risk of inherited cancer. Patient Educ Couns 2011 Aug;84(2):280-281. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    36. Wilcock PM, Brown GC, Bateson J, Carver J, Machin S. Using patient stories to inspire quality improvement within the NHS Modernization Agency collaborative programmes. J Clin Nurs 2003 May;12(3):422-430. [Medline]
    37. Crawford MJ, Rutter D, Manley C, Weaver T, Bhui K, Fulop N, et al. Systematic review of involving patients in the planning and development of health care. BMJ 2002 Nov 30;325(7375):1263 [FREE Full text] [Medline]
    38. UK Department of Health. 2005 Mar 17. Creating a Patient-Led NHS: Delivering the NHS Improvement Plan   URL: http:/​/www.​dh.gov.uk/​prod_consum_dh/​groups/​dh_digitalassets/​@dh/​@en/​documents/​digitalasset/​dh_4106507.​pdf [accessed 2011-06-15] [WebCite Cache]
    39. Welsh Assembly Government. 2003 Sep. Signposts Two: Putting Public and Patient Involvement Into Practice in Wales   URL: http:/​/wales.​gov.uk/​docrepos/​40382/​dhss/​reportsenglish/​signposts2-e.​pdf;jsessionid=qGTGN4McT9b6dwPjC0Trh1dY5jyFjbJ6NxLfhpl0nLpxXjbCh969!-342331487?lang=en [accessed 2011-06-15] [WebCite Cache]
    40. Expert Advisory Group on Cancer to the Chief Medical Officers of England and Wales. UK Department of Health, Welsh Office. 1995 Apr. A Policy Framework for Commissioning Cancer Services   URL: http:/​/www.​dh.gov.uk/​prod_consum_dh/​groups/​dh_digitalassets/​@dh/​@en/​documents/​digitalasset/​dh_4014366.​pdf [accessed 2011-06-15] [WebCite Cache]
    41. Cancer Genetics Research Team. Institute of Medical Genetics, Cardiff University School of Medicine. 2010. Cancer Genetics StoryBank   URL: http://www.cancergeneticsstorybank.co.uk/storytellers.htm [accessed 2011-06-15] [WebCite Cache]
    42. Weber RP. Basic Content Analysis. 2nd edition. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1990.
    43. Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-1288. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    44. DIPEx. 2008. Healthtalkonline   URL: http://www.healthtalkonline.org/ [accessed 2011-06-15] [WebCite Cache]
    45. Lewis C, Mehta P, Kent A, Skirton H, Coviello D. An assessment of written patient information provided at the genetic clinic and relating to genetic testing in seven European countries. Eur J Hum Genet 2007 Oct;15(10):1012-1022 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    46. Birru MS, Monaco VM, Charles L, Drew H, Njie V, Bierria T, et al. Internet usage by low-literacy adults seeking health information: an observational analysis. J Med Internet Res 2004 Sep 3;6(3):e25 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    47. Joseph G, Beattie MS, Lee R, Braithwaite D, Wilcox C, Metrikin M, et al. Pre-counseling education for low literacy women at risk of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC): patient experiences using the Cancer Risk Education Intervention Tool (CREdIT). J Genet Couns 2010 Oct;19(5):447-462. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    48. Iredale R, Gray J, Murtagh G. Telegenetics: a pilot study of videomediated genetic consultations in Wales. J Med Marketing 2002;2:130-135. [CrossRef]
    49. Statistics for Wales. Welsh Assembly Government. 2009. Wales's Population: A Demographic Overview, 2009   URL: http://wales.gov.uk/docs/statistics/2009/090326walespop09en.pdf [accessed 2011-06-15] [WebCite Cache]
    50. Alexander J, Zeibland S. The Web: bringing support and health information into the home: the communicative power of qualitative research. Int J Nurs Stud 2006 May;43(4):389-391. [CrossRef] [Medline]


    Abbreviations

    CGSW: Cancer Genetics Service for Wales
    NHS: National Health Service


    Edited by G Eysenbach; submitted 24.01.11; peer-reviewed by G Dolan, H Skirton; comments to author 25.04.11; revised version received 16.06.11; accepted 16.06.11; published 30.09.11

    ©Rachel Iredale, Lisa Mundy, Jennifer Hilgart. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 30.09.2011.

    This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.